• likebudda@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I was a regular dabber for years when I quit cold turkey in anticipation of drug tests during job applications. I was completely sober for 8 months and when I got hired without a drug test I was so mad. I was expecting more drastic changes during sobriety but the only thing I noticed was the return of dreams. I hadn’t really noticed their absence during my decades of cannabis use but while sober they were much more vivid and outlandish than I remember them being. They’ve since disappeared again once I resumed dabbing shortly after starting work.

      • Aneb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        I was also taking prozac when I was easing off weed. I had a zombie Apocalypse and meth addict dad, they were very vivid and frightening. I asked my psychologist abt it and she added a different med, they didn’t work. I felt less depressed and anxious so I came off Prozac and smoking again. No more dreams, that I can remember.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I quit vaping wax recently because I was tired of goldfish brain and, on top of my memory returning, the most noticeable shift was the return of dreams.

      I actually dreamed that I ate an edible and freaked out, only to realize I was in a dream. It’s the closest I’ve come to lucid dreaming in a very long time.

      • lordziv@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        This is me too. Being a software engineer and a daily smoker for over 10 years was not doing me any favors lol

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      the only thing I noticed was the return of dreams

      Same thing happened to me. I quit wake-and-baking about five and a half years ago because I felt it had just taken over too much of my life. Shortly afterward I became a school bus driver, which requires an initial drug screening and then you’re subject to random tests thereafter. I’m a little pissed that I’ve never been selected for the random test, which means I could have been happily puffing away for the last five years.

      The dreams are insanely weird and happen every time I sleep, even just a short nap. Most of the dreams are about me messing up driving a school bus and losing my job; one dream was me driving through high school hallways with kids scattering in all directions while thinking I really shouldn’t be doing this. I never dreamed at all when I was smoking.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It pays minimum wage with the barest benefits legally possible, with an inexperienced manager who thinks a boss should be a inconsistent tyrant. And it’s offered through a website that is far more interested in scraping whatever data it can find than actually matching people with jobs.

    But yeah, it’s the drug testing that’s the issue.

  • Peacepath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    12 hours ago

    War on drugs do not aim at reducing drug trasfic nor drug use. We all know it has never been effective anywhere for any drug.

    We also know that treating drug as a medical problem is the best way to reduce both use and traffic.

    War on drugs are just a way to force dealers to become more professional, and avoid “freelance” ones. War on drugs are a pure win for drugs, from their start.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    19 hours ago

    How is it possible that ‘companies can’t find enough workers’ but it takes more applications than ever to find a job? Something doesn’t fucking add up

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Most job applications are just data farming now. They aren’t for jobs that exist.

    • 87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They can’t find enought workers that will accept shit pay and 0 benefits, but they don’t like saying that.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      For us it’s an issue with marketing the position in a manner thay doesn’t result in 5,000 automated applications from an Indian headhunter firm that blindly clicks everything.

      I’ve had a job opening at my city for weeks that pays higher than any other city in the state does for the same position, and we’ve had a grand total of one applicant who wasn’t qualified.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It’s essentially someone to man the front desk, route phone calls, process simple single-trade building permits, and manage the contractor registry for the building department. It requires either a degree (of any kind just to show minimum qualifications) or experience in administrative duties or in an office or municipal setting.

          Our one applicant has never held a job more than 4 months and it’s mostly been retail or restaurant work.

          The catch with the job is the commute sucks. It’s a very wealthy area. Literally every homeowner in the city is at least a multi-millionaire, with multiple billionaires, so exactly 0 staff members live in town. We actually pay a pretty large monthly gas stipend on top of every employee’s salary.

          And while it shouldn’t impact a permit tech, the legal fights we have with residents are wild. The average person we end up in disputes with has more financial resources than the city itself, which is weird. Every city has residents constantly threatening to sue over everything, and 99.99% of the time it’s hot air, but with us they actually follow through. Which, oddly enough, makes us less likely to respond to legal threats since we’re used to going to court at this point.

    • Tiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Well there actually isn’t anyone looking at the applications! That would cost someone $20 a hour!

  • eurodyne@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I am 47, and I have never not once been tested for drugs for work.

    For most of my jobs, I’m relatively certain that drugs were in fact required.

    If anyone tried to test me for drugs, I would tell them to go fuck themselves, and I’d happily walk away from the interview.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’ve been tested only twice in my life (I’m nearly 60), once while in college for an engineering internship at IBM and once five years ago when I started driving a school bus. I actually failed the IBM drug test (for marijuana) but they just told me to “clean up my act” and gave me the intership anyway. I’m kind of OK with drug testing school bus drivers only because there’s not really any way of testing whether or not a driver is currently high. On the other hand, they don’t regularly test drivers for alcohol and it’s more common than most parents would want to know for drivers to be drunk.

    • Devial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I live in Germany, and over here unless your employer can present a damn good safety critical reason for why you must be sober at work (e.g. operating heavy machinery) it’s not even legal to randomly drug test employees.

      For your standard office job, or McDonalds cashier, or even high level office positions it would all be illegal for the employer to (randomly) drug test you.

      As long as you’re not operating dangerous machinery, it’s none of your employers business what you do off the clock at home, even if that’s consuming illegal drugs. They can (obviously) ban you from being high at work, but they would reasonable suspicion to accuse of you violating that, and potentially trigger a test (which means effectively the thing that is banned is for your performance at work to be impaired by drugs. If you work equally well high as sober, and don’t reek of weed when you walk in, you can pretty much just work high without risk of much consequences)

      • eurodyne@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        All I know about Germany is that, aside from producing the world‘s most AWESOME gay porn, and having some extremely bizarre trash disposal laws, it is an confoundingly boring country.

        But it’s nice to know that, aside from the outrageously restrictive drug laws, they don’t do on the job drug testing.

    • LordCrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I have told prosprective employers to fuck off over:

      take a drug test

      Take a psych test

      Unlock my credit for credit checks

      Take a full face scan

      Register with id.me for the application process

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      a handful of my jobs they knew i was heavily medicated and were offering me more drugs (part time office work in between surgeries)

    • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Im 46, and I’ve only had one job that didnt do a pre-employment drug test. But most of my jobs have involved machines that can hurt people if not handled right.

      • chunk6235@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The only jobs I didn’t get a piss test were all retail/food service. Every professional job I’ve had (tech) has made me drop a UA. I may have had to study to pass the pre-employment test, but thankfully no place I’ve been does randoms.

        As my former manager put it, boss man isn’t going to make us drop a UA cuz he knows he’s lose his whole IT department.

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I was a programmer for 25 years and never had a drug test in that time. No employer ever even contemplated doing it. In general, programming high or drunk isn’t going to hurt anybody, but I did once have a colleague accidentally shoot a 125 mph knuckleball a foot over a kid’s head. He wasn’t coding high as far as I know, but he was coding stupid, which is a lot worse.

        • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Ok, storytime!

          I worked in a little fabrication shop back in 2013 or so. The general manager got a hair up his ass and decided he was going to drug test everyone.

          We lost everyone on all three shifts except for me, and my supervisor. My supervisor had been picked up a month prior for possession, and was getting regular drug tests from someone else. Im just boring.

          The shop closed down a few months later. They couldn’t get anyone to work there, because people who do that kind of work talk to each other.

      • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’m 46 and my line of work is one of the more dangerous jobs involving heavy equipment. There is always a drug test as a pre employment screening, but that’s basically it. Nobody checks again because they’d have to fire half the workforce.

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I’m a school bus driver and drug testing is a DOT mandatory requirement. Some of the districts around me have a reputation for making sure the “random” tests are only give to the drivers they know will pass, so a driver just has to keep clean long enough to pass the initial screening.

      • eurodyne@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        There are some jobs for which I can understand when it would be very important to ensure the operators of heavy equipment absolutely must be guaranteed to be sober at all times.

        Beyond heavy machine operators, this also includes livery drivers, airline pilots, etc.

        But those are specialty jobs for which my previous comments are excluded.

        Thank you for doing your job well, and soberly

        • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Don’t forget Healthcare and insurance. I only know insurance because I have an uncle that has said he’d start micro dosing just to help him sleep but that could result in loss of his license

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I’m skeptical that’s what we’re actually testing for, though. Employment drug tests are just to see if they’ll stop doing drugs for a month. We don’t expect heavy machine operators to do a field sobriety test at the start of their shift.

            • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              For a given value of “random”.

              A lot of places that did random drug screens, I would be “randomly” chosen every time because they knew I’d pass.

    • Ironrod@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’m 36 and have been drugs tested once. They reckoned they’d seen me drop a gram of coke on camera so I got 6 weeks paid holiday.

      • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I have been drug tested several times, and I am in fact “on drugs”. So, I get a call within a couple of days of getting tested to provide them with access to my pharmacy records to prove they are legally prescribed.
        So, wtf were they doing that you got 6 weeks?

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Same, and once I even got into a position where I was told I was free to sue a potential employer because they dismissed me without giving an opportunity to present proof of prescription

        • Ironrod@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Apparently it fell out of my pocket on a Monday morning (doubtful but I did head home for the weekend and blacked out a bit so possible…but I would have done the coke if that was the case 😂) got dragged into a meeting on Wednesday, pissed clean and just got told to go home until I heard otherwise.

      • eurodyne@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Obviously, because nobody oopsie-daisies a gram of coke without going back to grab it, lol.

        • Ironrod@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          😂 I don’t live in the best area and my dog is an early morning boy, I’ve found 3 grams this month. Kinda feel sorry for whoever lost it but I’m also no longer a fan so hopefully that might help someone

          • eurodyne@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 hours ago

            So… Where do you live? Please drop a pin on a map and reply only in a DM.

            I’ll drop by and bring snacks!

    • motoxjake@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yeah, most restaurants dont test for drugs for a reason.

      On the flip side, I’ve had to take a drug test for every single job I’ve ever had. Most are sales related. But I travel for work so I kind of understand the need 10 years ago when everything was illegal. Now that weed is mostly legal everywhere its pointless to even test for it.

      • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I work with a vulnerable population. In addition to every job doing piss testing my fingerprints and DNA get recorded and checked against unsolved assaults / murders. Nothing ever comes up but I always worry I’m gonna be like the last person that touched a vase before the dude that bashed somebody’s head in with it and the dude who did it isn’t in any databases and I’m gonna have to answer a bunch of intrusive questions.

      • TheRagingGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Anytime I have worked for fintech I’ve been tested and fully background checked every time, pretty annoying but the trade off is the pay I suppose

      • eurodyne@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        If I wanna buy blow in whatever city I’m visiting, I always ask a bartender or a waiter for a hook up.

        It’s a rule I refer to as “industry standard”

      • eurodyne@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        How does that Nazi dick taste?

        Nobody fucking tells me when I can piss. I am the sole authority over my own bodily functions.

        It was a sad day because you and so many of your coworkers handed that over to any authority at all. You fucking cowards. You gave them the power to abuse you. then you had the temerity to come here and rationalize it.

        Classic victim behavior

          • eurodyne@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            Wow. How pathetic.

            Marching into the gas chambers, while still defending the Nazis who shoved you in there.

            “I had no choice but to let them exterminate me!”

            I guess some people will never learn…

            • homes@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Oh fucking look, the idiot/bot that replied within seconds has nothing to say all of a sudden trying to mark an anarchist as a Nazi.

              Funny how you called yourself out for being an idiot/bot

              😂

              It seems that your AI chat buddy doesn’t understand the concept of comment hierarchies… Lol

  • gigastasio@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    23 hours ago

    We’ve had a sign posted at work saying “We are proud to be a drug-free workplace. All new and current employees are subject to drug testing at any time.”

    Not. Once. Not even when Jimmy came in to work each evening with the smell of weed wafting off of him. I could probably lay rails on my work table right in front of the security camera and hit one each hour and nothing would happen.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Sure, but that’s not what the policies are for. If/when someone gets injured on the job the policy is standardly they require you to take a drug test then. If you fail you were breaking policy and the injury is deemed your fault, thus taking all responsibility of paying you workers comp off the table. Happens every day across the U.S. (that said I believe you can fight it, as you aren’t always automatically eliminated if you fail the drug test, you will have an up hill battle though)

      • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I worked at a factory in the rural south the year (2022) they quietly did away with marijuana testing, even for spot violations. Turns out the standard reasoning, “the insurance company says,” doesn’t really matter… they didn’t care and allowed a 9-panel to be used in all testing matters.

        The unofficial reason I heard is, they go through the same workers on rotation, the good employees get hired back and forth. Drunks are chaotic, tweakers introduce drugs and are chaotic. Stoners are quiet and show up on time, and cause 0% of the fights, and tend to come with less of a rap sheet for terroristic threats and domestics.

        They almost tripped over themselves to look the other way on my stonership…

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah I remember when my factory hired a young woman to head HR shortly after weed was legalized where I lived and she immediately got to ensuring we wouldn’t be punished for smoking. The stoners are rarely a problem, and you really don’t want to lose a bunch of people just because their mild drug of choice is fat soluble instead of water soluble

          It does amuse me how I’ve had doctors and employers drug test me which only pushed me from weed to acid

          • johnyreeferseed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Meanwhile I worked at one company in Colorado that didn’t test for marijuana at all when I got hired, I specifically asked. Then 6 months later hired some lady from Utah and they started testing all new employees for marijuana and threatening drug tests whenever something happened. Marijuana having been legal in the state for like 15 years at that point.

      • SpacePanda@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        50 minutes ago

        For weed, get a medical card, if you can afford it. Usually even in recreational states you can get one and then they can’t fire you for it.

        • QualifiedKitten@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I live in a state with recreational marijuana, but my current employer’s policies specifically prohibit even medical marijuana, and I had to do a pre-employment drug test. Looking for a better job, but I’ve exhausted unemployment and all my savings, so it pays the bills for now.

          • SpacePanda@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            55 minutes ago

            Oh that sucks, I completely understand though. You do what you need to do to pay the bills. I had a driving job like that, which makes sense.

          • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Is that not protected under anti-disability discrimination legislation in the US?

            I’m on medical cannabis in the UK, while our system is not set up for it at all if an employer took umbrage with it for a non-operational reason (such as operating heavy machinery vs being on it at all) that’d be a fairly open and shut disability discrimination case. Same as if you fired an employee for being on tramadol or similar.

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Yeah, federally it’s classified as “no medicinal benefits with high potential for abuse”, aka schedule 1. This is why I can sue (or even get the government to sue on my behalf) an employer for firing me when my prescribed amphetamines trip a drug test, but the government can mandate employers that work with it to fire anyone who fails a cannabis test regardless of prescription status.

                Biden was in the process of rescheduling cannabis, and honestly I’ve got issues with the whole scheduling system considering that it says cannabis and acid are worse than heroin and forces opiates and adhd meds into the same regulatory box despite abuse of them looking more like proper use of the other.

              • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Christ, how does that work with your doctors being way more keen to prescribe narcotics than ours then? Is it literally a case of follow your doctor’s orders or your boss’s? That’s fucked up.

                • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Side note update for you, thanks to the Sacklers and the hell on earth they visited on us via profiteering lying about the opiates they invented, now there’s actually a gigantic back swing and it’s WAY more difficult to be prescribed strong pain relief, even when badly needed. Count on us to always come up with the worst possible response to a problem, I guess.

                • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Prescribed narcotics would be OK as long as related doctor or company restrictions on operating heavy equipment or such were complied with. But in the US marijuana is still federally illegal. The feds usually don’t seek out prosecutions where states have legalized at the state level, but banks won’t accept business accounts if marijuana is sold because of the federal illegality, and businesses involving heavy machinery generally also still feel the legal risk of explicitly allowing marijuana use is too high.

          • SpacePanda@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            48 minutes ago

            Citation? I’m confused, for what? Clearly I’m missing something because 24 people agree with you lol

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          21 hours ago

          You can have a prescription for opiates too.

          Doesn’t make it OK to be high at a job where that impairment puts you and others in danger.

          That being said, there’s no test for THC that has a narrow enough time window to tell if someone is currently intoxicated. Blood tests are the closest at 6h, but blood levels aren’t correlated with intoxication.

          • SpacePanda@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            51 minutes ago

            I never said it did. I agree its better to use at home after work. Some people have a beer I have a j, shouldnt be drinking at work either. I didnt know they can precisely test for opioids like that.

      • Impleader@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        22 hours ago

        “Drug-free workplace” policy language is also a requirement for a lot of government contracts in the US

  • AeronMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    23 hours ago

    America: big on winning wars.

    …Lost the war on terror to terror.

    …Lost the war on drugs to drugs.

  • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’m a medical provider at a university hospital. They have a drug testing policy, but they have only ever utilized it for staff, not faculty members. I’ve worked in my clinic for more than ten years and have never been drug tested.

    Pretty sure the hospital administrators really don’t want to know if any of their physicians have any bad habits. It’s kinda a lose lose situation for the hospital, and it’s pretty well known that our field has substance abuse issues.

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Health care should be one of the top 3 places to test. But having worked in healthcare for 20+ years a doctor could come in for the drug test, do a rail in front of the tester, make the hold the cup while they piss all over the place and walk out smiling, and admin would think nothing less of it

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah… Unfortunately, as long as you still have the ability to bill Medicare under your NPI you really have to work to get dismissed from a hospital.

        The head of my department is currently being sued by the advertising and media department for making his own commercial. The advertising department made a commercial that didn’t feature him as much as he thought it should so he just made and aired his own commercial featuring official branding of the university and hospital.

        He had to take down the commercial, but he continues to print off shirts for everyone in our department about the commercial. The administration’s stance on the whole thing was just to let the two departments work it out.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    23 hours ago

    “I have to hire a great work force to compete with those cyber criminals and some of those kids want to smoke weed on the way to the interview,” - James Comey as FBI director.