• artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    280
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Age ratings tell parents what’s in a game so they can make informed decisions for their kids. These AI statements are just as partisan as mandatory political essays or forcing developers to list their voting history to drive cancel campaigns and public struggle sessions.

    Absolutely fuck this fucking guy.

      • noob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        93
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Capitalists - consumers guide the market by making informed ethical purchasing decisions.

        Also capitalists - labeling requirements? Absolutely not.

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s a great “better to remain silent at the risk of being thought a fool than to talk and remove all doubt” moment. He can’t help himself, it’s like the more power and money someone has, the more time they have to imagine how they’re victims.

      But I like to know who is an awful person so I can avoid them, so thanks Tim.

      • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I figured that many people are sad and lonely, ultra rich people too but they usually also are low empathy ones so that’s why they are lonely (and thus sad). Money just helps them force their thoughts down other peoples throats without effort.

    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Since when the fuck has AI been partisian? It sounds like he’s trying to make it partisian. In reality, everyone hates the data centers. The only thing that’s partisan-adjacent is that the Trump administration (Trump specifically) loves it, but that’s just because he’s a boomer and boomers, for some reason I do not yet understand, tend to like the shitty photo/video generative AI more than others.

      • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        People like this have two reasons to make it partisan:

        1. It’s a way for them to stay delusionally self-victimized since “AI would be a total success if it weren’t for that group of haters” and it’s convenient to make the haters the political out-group, since typically these people already view themselves as tragically oppressed politically (while somehow having all of the power and being the only oppressors themselves).
        2. If they succeed in making it partisan, that means they gain about 30% of the population as supporters via political team sports, versus 90% bipartisan hate right now.
      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        The only reason Trump loves it is because it’s propping up our entire economy.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          AI companies are also paying for tons of political advertising, and republicans are using it most to create their ads too.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        As aggravating as this might be to hear, there is at least one state where workers unions have been pro-datacenter under the belief that the work to build them will at least bring them some contracting/construction jobs. Some states are destitute enough to accept anything, even if it’s only a short-term bandaid for their economic troubles.

  • BougieBirdie@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    186
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    He calls it an “anti-technology smear campaign”, and claims that it’s akin to Valve forcing developers to list their political affiliation, i.e. whether they vote Republican or Democrat

    Billionaires and false equivalencies, name a more iconic duo

    I mean, if we’re going to compare apples and oranges, how about with a metaphor that makes sense? Like how if you sell food you have to list the ingredients used

  • audaxdreik@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    171
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Does everyone remember how Steam banned NFT games and Epic allowed them and how that absolutely catapulted them into success over their competitor? … no?

    OK, well, but maybe this time?

  • Kraiden@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    There’s a real economic cost to [blah blah crybaby way of saying AI disclosures]

    Yes. There is. Because informed consumers vote with their wallets. As it should be. Moron.

    • Aeder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      The Epic Store has always been anti-consumer so it’s no surprise he defends that kind of practice.

        • iamthetot@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’m not sure what your point is because Steam is absolutely flooded with porn games, especially since the rise of genAI.

      • Corn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        6 days ago

        It gives consumers free games and takes a smaller cut from the developers than steam. All corporations have mutually exclusive interests with the consumer tho.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          They do that to try to gain marketshare. They should try to just stop being shitty instead and improve their client. And get off Xitter.

          • Corn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            5 days ago

            They do that to try to gain marketshare.

            This is every single action any entity which exists to extract profit from you that isn’t immediately increasing revenue or decreasing expenses/wages.

            They should try to just stop being shitty

            Once again, this is done to gain marketshare

            It’s weird as fuck to see people with loyalty to one corporation or another.

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Sue. My point is they’re not doing it out of the good of their heart. They’re doing it in lieu of actually making it a good platform to buy from.

              • Corn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                5 days ago

                No corporation has ever done anything out of the good of its heart because they do not have hearts, you are still treating them like people instead of entities that exist exclusively to extract money from you while giving as little money to its workers as possible.

                They’re doing it in lieu of actually making it a good platform to buy from.

                Nah, giving the workers more money and me free games does more to make a platform viable than features. But doing shit everyone hates like filling your store with slop games that can’t be identified until you’ve already paid is a dumb decision.

                • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  You’re an idiot that only cares about getting free stuff. You are arguing against people having “loyalty to one corporation or another” while endlessly defending the objectively worse company simply because you like to get free games…

        • endbringer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          It gives consumers free games

          Wow, amazing. Nevermind that most those giveaways are on sales for peanuts anyway. And you get them on garbage launcher.

          and takes a smaller cut from the developers than steam.

          Great, they take smaller cut. At a low, low cost of being a black hole of exposure. But hey! They do take a smaller cut from the two copies you do sell.

        • Aeder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          So do developers on Steam, you literally have a filter for free games. While also having user reviews, forums, a sane refund policy, regional pricing, curators, funding Linux driver development, as well as a shopping cart (though I heard Epic Store finally put enough braincells together to get that one too).

    • BillionaireStew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I notice slopcoders often maintain that “slop code is just as good as code written by humans- in fact it is better!” while also refusing to clearly label their output as slop.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      At this point he has whined about it so much that everyone’s going to know the game uses AI, even if they don’t disclose it. He would have genuinely being better off shutting up about it.

  • AmeijinG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 days ago

    Billionaire Doesn’t Want You to Make Informed Decisions About Your Purchases - more news at 11

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t think that everyone uses Ai, even with Unreal. Unless there are features that has to be used and are basically Ai components.

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Tim Sweeney owns the Unreal engine, so I think their point was that Unreal itself is going to be so AI slop-coded that games made on it will need disclosures because they came out of the Unreal bucket.

        • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Ah, I see. Well I didn’t think of that one. Yeah, that’s a valid point. If the Engine itself is vibe slopped, well then the game developed with the Engine is basically Ai assisted / partially generated.

  • df0@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 days ago

    One thing is for sure. Whatever happens, Tim Sweeney will never stop whining and crying online. It is as if he’s taken on a challenge to take Musk’s throne as the saddest, least funny online personality.

  • steelplatedmech@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    He is a great example of CEOs who would help their company image more if they never made themselves known.

    More he talks the more insufferable he comes off and in return so does the company.

    If it weren’t for how he chose to make his personality so prominent, Epic would probably not be as hated among PC gamers.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      You either get ousted a gaming hero or stay on the board long enough to become the CEO villain.

      I think only Croteam has managed to exist as long as they have without going evil or being bought out*, but they’ve never quite been successful enough for that to happen.

      edit: Just remembered that Croteam’s publisher bought them, but they were at risk of shutting down and Devolver Digital seems like one of the good publishers.

  • LostWanderer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    6 days ago

    ROFL Given the vibe-coded disaster of the Epic Store on Linux, he has bigger things to be concerned about. Like fixing his own mess. By hand, with actual humans programming and resolving issues. Catching a vibe won’t save Epic, real human effort will. What a loser.

    • Broadfern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Idiot could have made bank on goodwill if he donated to Heroic development, but chose to shoot himself in the foot with a hallucination gun instead lmao

      • LostWanderer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Well, he’s a dumpster fire capitalist, there was no other outcome for him. Just another cooked in the head CEO that worshiping a nonexistent God to gain infinite wealth, which happens to be the idea of AI. Trying to manifest so hard he can’t think of intelligent business strategies…

      • steelplatedmech@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        He just had to be quiet and not say anything for Epic to be seen in a positive light. He hasn’t caught on to how much charima he lacks and how offputting he comes off as a person.

  • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Can someone ask this dumb fuck if he’s also this upset about ingredient labels on food?

    News flash, Timmy: people want to know at least a little bit about how the sausage is made, otherwise we’d all be forced to eat Soylent Green by greedy, unethical capitalist billionaires like you.

    Valve understands what the customer wants, Epic simply does not.