• vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 days ago

    You seem to be operating under the misplaced assumption that Trump’s goal with the tariffs was to actually bring manufacturing back to the US or improve the US economy in any way. It’s understandable if you haven’t paid very close attention to Trump over the past 9 years. But whenever thinking about him or his policies, you have to keep one thing top of mind: Trump is a habitual liar who only cares about his own personal wealth and power.

    He’s not trying to bring manufacturing back to the US or improve the US economy. He’s doing market manipulation to increase his wealth and that of those who helped get him into power. He doesn’t give a shit about you or me or any of the rest of us. He couldn’t care less if the US crumbled into dust tomorrow, so long as he’s still on top.

  • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yes but you, like everyone I seem to talk to these days, is under the false impression that Trump isn’t a complete idiot who literally thinks tariffs are the solution to all problems. It’s more comforting to think there’s some massive conspiracy by Russia or that it’s a ploy to make money off the stock market, but I truly believe that Trump actually thinks tariffs will magically fix the economy and his reactions to the backlash are legitimate shock that so many people and the markets don’t agree. Yes Russia does stand to gain from this, but they don’t need to pull the strings when the guy in charge is innovating economic policy so stupid that a smart person would have trouble even imagining it.

    Trump decisions make more sense when you realize he is actually stupid as fuck and there’s no hidden chess moves or anyone pulling the strings from the shadows. There is nobody at the wheel who is actually competent even if they’re evil. This is all just the whims of a complete moron who is probably also going a bit senile as well.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    The goal wasn’t tho further the economy. The goal was to further racism and hate.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    There’s a thousand better ways to handle both tariffs and free trade. We fucked up the latter with NAFTA (and CAFTA), where the EU got it right. Bringing jobs home with tariffs isn’t something you just snap your fingers and do, shit takes a long time to re-align, it would’ve made a lot more sense to have it go through the legislature and say “hey, we’re starting out at a 10% tariff on this stuff we want to bring home, and we’re going to ratchet it up +2% every year until Congress doesn’t pass the law again.” Instead, we’ve got the most volatile president in history implementing tariffs by fiat: 10% 20% actually none actually 10% actually 125% for real this time. Yeah, in this situation, the best play is to just try and wait dumbass out, because there’s a non-zero chance he wakes up tomorrow and declares tariffs woke.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Weeelllllll…

      We’re violating trade agreements with our tariffs. But giving tax breaks to companies that re-shore industry would also likely violate trade agreements, because it would create ‘unfair competition’. Kinda like the way that China has given subsidies to certain industries–such as solar panel producers–has created unfair competition, since they have far lower costs than other solar panel producers. As such, tax breaks and incentives would probably also hurt our trade relations, because we would essentially be taking jobs out of other countries. …But that would probably hurt out relations with other countries far, far less than what we’re doing now.

      Honestly, there’s not a great way to bring manufacturing jobs back in a way that doesn’t harm our relationships with other countries, or our national interests in some way. By purchasing shit from companies with lower labor costs/standards of living/higher levels of labor abuse/etc., we’ve undercut our ability to produce the same goods at a competitive price while also keeping our own standards. Even if we went back to pay ratios between workers and executives that existed 50 years ago (I think that lowest to highest ratio in large companies was about 150:1 in the late 60s), that wouldn’t be enough to keep our living standards, avoid labor abuses, and still be competitive with shit we get from China.

      This is compounded by the fact that we do have some of this manufacturing in the US, because it’s more-or-less required by the Barry Amendment (USC 10 §2533(a)). But the costs are astronomical. Take a backpack made by Mystery Ranch. Their Black Jack 80–identical to the USSOCOM SPEAR Patrol bag they make, just with another name–is $1200. The version that’s made in Vietnam and is not Barry-compliant, was about $400. The materials and craftsmanship were substantially identical, but the fabrics were sourced from outside the US, and the manufacturing was done outside the US. There’s no reasonable way that the US gov’t can subsidize those kinds of costs.

  • payhn@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    You can either convince people with a carrot to do what you want and hope they will comply or make them comply with a sharp expensive stick 🤷‍♂️ Orange man doesn’t seem to like carrots

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      The problem is if you hit everyone with a stick sometimes they just leave and you are left just playing with your carrot by yourself

      • payhn@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m business the last one standing is the winner. That could be his goal

        • BussyCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          That’s factually not true; what happens to a company with no competition but also no customers and no suppliers? There is a reason why the most successful companies aren’t isolated from the world

  • oo1@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    If you want to boost USA manufacturing industries I’d look at the sector that killed it first.

    Bring in international capital controls, forex restrictions, limit consumer / mortgage credit maybe bring in some directed credit requirements. Badically the bank regulation that was chucked out in the 1970s. When us msnufacturing industry mysteriously started to decline. 70s recessions were not only caused by oil price shocks, and the sectoral shift was reinforced by bank liberalisation.

    I’d think you’d want to force the USA finance industry to invest (at least some decent amount) in the future of USA productive capacity, instead of letting them invest in China’s future and have an arms race to fuel a perpetual domestic property bubble.

    Tarrifs might still be part of it - but if your domestic companies can’t borrow, they can’t grow or maintain/develop asset base.If they don’t have working capital facilities, they liquidate fast.

    Tax breaks might work/help (as might tarrifs), but if taxes are all on profits, you still need to borrow against the future to make the investment in the present (i.e. make a loss and pay no tax anyway) to build the productive capacity. They’d be better for short payback or labour intensive industries than for capital intensive industry - without other stuff.

    I guess if you mean income tax breaks for workers in certin types of jobs/companies, that is interesting. Either way you need quite a lot of monitoring to avoid corruption of just wierd distortions with unintended consequences. That’s what banks lending to businesses should do and be good at, monitoring their loans and their debtors.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    ·
    7 days ago

    His goal is to enrich himself and hurt others while getting praised like a toddler that just shit on the toilet for the first time.

  • salacious_coaster@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 days ago

    Look. He had the stupid tariff idea. He liked it because he likes the thought of getting his way by punishing people who defy him. That’s how he sees tariffs. It wasn’t a good idea. People told him that. So, being a stubborn narcissist, he wanted to do it more. Now here we are.

  • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Trump doesn’t want you to buy local. He wants you to shop on Amazon and drive a Chinese-built Tesla.

  • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yeah, certainly if he were a normal President. But he’s a textbook narcissist who only gives a shit about himself and capitulating to the ultra elite. Throw some performance goals set up by his boss Vladimir Putin, and what do you get?

    Absolute fucking chaos alongside fleecing the lower 99.99% for anything you can get and manufacturing a crash in the stock market so you and your elite friends can, you guessed it, profit from it tremendously.

    A rational president, you bet. This dude is not that.

  • BigFig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    The goal is not to better the country or the economy. The goal is to make money, for his friends and connections to make money, and leave everything else destroyed while they laugh.

    The tariffs not making sense is expected.