I’ve always read it as “shit just works”. Why would the “sh” be there if we weren’t supposed to read it?

Works for me, no idea what you’re seeing or talking about

Why was it previously allowed, one may ask.

yes, bullet points would have been even better, but this is ok

please learn to format lemmy posts correctly, no one can read that

Only when someone else (usually online) talks about that concept, not otherwise.

Mike Masnick is usually right about most things, but in this case section 230 is just the wrong defense to use. That really is meant for hosting providers, not software providers. Doesn’t mean they will be held liable, or should be, but it has nothing to do with section 230 as I understand it.

I normally only look at communities I am subscribed to and am not subscribed to places where such things are usually posted. You could try that too.

In general I dislike communities with concepts like “pics”, “comics”, “memes”, etc., I don’t want to see just any pics or comics, I want to see ones I might find interesting. Lemmy is unfortunately not yet a big enough place that it has specialized communities for everything.

What kind of information do you want to know about him? What do you find biased about whatever you’ve been reading? It’s not very clear how to answer this question.

By volume, usually I stop pouring milk when it covers approximately 4/5 of the cereal. That makes it so when I put my spoon in it, the cereal at the very top will also absorb some milk.

That definitely sounds like a problem. I am not familiar enough with WordPress, is that store not FOSS or are the plugins not or what is going on?

The point of free software is that it doesn’t have owners and you (individually or collectively) can just create an “alternative” yourself by forking it if you disagree with anything its maintainers do.

me too, I loved Verdana before I discovered FOSS and DejaVu Sans is basically FOSS Verdana

nah that’s when my parents were born and their lives don’t seem that awesome tbh

Ten years earlier, i.e. mid-1980s. I would have been a young adult when the Internet was starting to be awesome, instead I was a preteen or early teen.

As for location, the US would be nice tbh.

If I ever manage to earn ~3000 euros (my current net salary) a month from just investments and interest, I will definitely consider myself rich. There may still be richer people than me even in that scenario, which is why I wrote that “rich” is a relative descriptor.

Of course, rich is a relative descriptor, like tall or heavy, some people are richer than others.

I would call anyone who doesn’t need to work in order to live (i.e. who can live off investments and interest) rich.

Not very, it is mostly downvoted so won’t appear very high in most people’s feeds

For Python definitely PyCharm.

Pokémon taught children everywhere that if they enter strangers’ houses without warning, the strangers might randomly give them useful objects that help them in life.