Summary

The Biden administration will allow California to ban new gas-powered car sales by 2035, with 11 other states following. This uses a Clean Air Act waiver permitting stricter state-level pollution controls to curb greenhouse gas emissions.

Trump plans to revoke the waiver, roll back EV tax credits, and fight California’s climate policies, potentially sparking legal battles.

California, leading the U.S. in EV adoption, aims to “Trump-proof” its agenda, bolstered by automaker deals and strong market influence.

The ban could accelerate EV investments, shaping nearly half of the U.S. auto market and global climate policy trends.

Non-paywall link

    • hydrashok@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      They can restrict the sale and the registration (license plate/tabs) of new gas cars within the state. Someone can still go to another state to buy one, but they can’t get a CA plate for it. And that’s on top of trying to figure it how to get insurance coverage for it.

        • hydrashok@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          If everyone could get easy, cheap car insurance outside of their home state or region, don’t you think it would be a widespread phenomena already?

            • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I’m not sure exactly what it is you’re going after here, the issue is reducing the number of ICE vehicles being produced and sold. Unless your argument is that most people will just go elsewhere, then I don’t see how it isn’t a net win (ignoring the glaring issue that EVs are still cars)

              If you’re complaining about the inequity of laws, that’s a real issue, but this isn’t a good example to go after.

              • I wasnt aware tgat if people went elsewhere it didnt effect the environment. Perhaps we should just put all the environmentally damaging activities elsewhere and problem solved?

                Im simply saying its a law that effects the everyday wage slave while the millionaires and billionaires get to keep doing as they please fucking the environment while u cant because u cant afford to register ur car out of state.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      They can ban the sale. They can also refuse to register the car, so no license plate. You’d get in a fair amount of trouble if caught driving an unregistered vehicle.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        They can also refuse to register the car,

        Virginia has a model for this that can be a tad regressive; not sure about CA. On the one hand, there’s regular safety and emissions tests that must be passed or you cannot (re)register your car for the coming year or two. This more or less keeps deathtraps and oil-burning-smog-machines off the road. On the other hand, it has absolutely crippled plenty of households just scraping by where that old car is needed to just break even every month. Depending on where one stands on car-dependent culture and if owning/operating a vehicle is a necessity, it can be quite the contentious issue.

        Point being, I can easily see how a higher bar for registration, and re-registration, can change the makeup of what’s on the road. I can also see how that can suddenly prevent a whole chunk of the population from participating.