The suit, filed Monday, accuses the city and its officials of launching a harassment campaign against Dad’s Place, a church in Bryan, for keeping its doors open 24/7 for the homeless.

An Ohio pastor who was charged with zoning violations for housing people experiencing homelessness has filed a federal lawsuit against the city of Bryan and its officials.

Earlier this year, Pastor Chris Avell decided to keep the doors of his church, Dad’s Place, open 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to reach out to the city’s most “vulnerable.” Bryan is a small city of about 8,600 people, 65 miles west of Toledo.

In December, Avell was hit with 18 zoning violations by the city, which claimed he had violated a city ordinance that says residents can’t stay on the first floor of that property. Further, the local fire chief found a slew of fire code violations at the church.

Avell pleaded not guilty to the charges at his Jan. 11 arraignment, according to online court records.

Now he’s suing the city, claiming discrimination on the basis of religion and claiming city officials have launched a harassment campaign against the church.

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    162
    ·
    11 months ago

    The article should be titled “City politicians upset that local church opposed to their plan to criminalize poverty”

    • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      11 months ago

      Or “City officials upset that local Christian community actually acts Christian.”

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Exactly this is the same bullshit as arresting people for feeding starving homeless

      It’s fucking sick

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      11 months ago

      The fire chief finding a bunch of code violations is pretty serious imo

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Those violations may also be “someone was sleeping in front of a fire door.”

          As Mitch Hedberg joked, no one that is flammable is ever actually blocking a fire exit.

  • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Imagine that, a pastor actually thinking to himself “what would Jesus do?” and doing that, and being punished for it.

    This is why I, regardless of political lean, think the real enemy is bureaucrats. Bureaucrats aren’t even really people. They’re the lizard people all the conspiracy theory/tin foil hat wearers screech about.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You’re thinking of politicians. Bureaucracy is the scapegoat they use to cover their machinations. A functional society needs bureaucrats to do all the tasks that makes society work, without them everything would fall apart.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Most self-professed American “Christians” I have ever met do not follow or believe in the teachings of Christ.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      They say the world looks down on the bureaucrats

      They say we’re anal, compulsive, and weird

      But when push comes to shove

      You gotta do what you love

      Even if it’s not a good idea!

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      I always thought churches were known as sanctuaries. It’s not like he’s permanently housing people, he’s literally providing sanctuary from the deadly weather

  • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    where are the riots for better wages, housing, better public services, for actual politicians that are public servants out to do right for the citizens they themselves depend on, for worker’s rights, or for anything?

    what happened to the US?

      • Pirky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        11 months ago

        We’re also really tired from our demanding jobs. Most of us also can’t just suddenly take time off work to protest these things.
        Plus it’s effort driving from our homes to wherever the protests may be. I’m being partially facetious here, but these all play a factor in this.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      You don’t know about them because the media either refuses to cover them or misrepresents them.

      For example, consider the shitshow going on around Cop City in Atlanta: the police have already murdered one protestor in cold blood, the mayor is thwarting a public referendum, etc.

    • Binthinkin@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Entitled dumb as shit boomers are what happened. You know the ones; they love mob stories and cops and robbers and cowboys and indians and oh are they SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO SMART!

    • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Why aren’t you personally doing something?

      Downvoting me won’t solve the world’s problems.

      • eric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Judging by their wording, it sounds like they are from somewhere other than the US. What do you expect a foreigner to do that could possibly affect US domestic policy?

    • waz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Though I see your point, I’d rather have less Jesus in our government, not more.

      • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        The government should not block him from exercising his religion though. Housing the people experiencing homelessness is exactly what Jesus would do.

        • CompostMaterial@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          No, people being assholes is what caused this. Mega corporations are what caused this. Jesus is a fairy tale no different than Snow White. People are what can make the world better or worse, not some mythical being or spell.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Jesus is a fairy tale no different than Snow White

            Eh, I mean, there is a real historical figure that the bible character is based on. The miracles obviously didn’t happen, but there’s reasonable debate to be had about how much of the other stuff regarding his teachings is accurate to the real person.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      This could actually be a genius loophole. Charge some absurdly low fee as an “air bnb”.

      Oh whoops, let me just give you the amount needed as a gift. Whoopsies! Sorry officer, no free housing here, these are paying guests.

  • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    people experiencing homelessness

    How is that term better than “homeless people”

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I think the logic is that the latter is saying that being homeless is part of who they are as a person, whereas the former sees them as regular people who are currently experiencing homelessness. It’s like how people are shifting away from saying “drug addict,” and saying things like “person addicted to drugs” or saying “undocumented” instead of “illegal” as it’s less dehumanizing.

      It’s a small, subtle difference, but I get it.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It isn’t, unhoused is the best I’ve heard personally.

      Both makes it clear that the problem is housing and acknowledges that the “homeless” often do have homes of a sort.

      The phrase is trying to emphasize that being unhoused is a temporary condition that can be remedied but it’s just too unwieldy in conversation to do anything but annoy people.

      • Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        They want them visible to act as a warning to the working class; work and die or starve and die. The only thing is they want them visible to others but they don’t want to see it themselves

    • Num10ck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      they are supposed to scare the middle class into not risking their livelihoods.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Around here, apparently, miles outside of town. All the bridges have ‘no trespassing’ signs by them (in English and Spanish, and this is Indiana). I live outside of town and I regularly see people walking down the highway to get to their crappy minimum wage jobs. It probably takes them over an hour to walk, and it was -15 here last week.

      So apparently where they’re supposed to go is a tent out in the woods.

    • ArtieShaw@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Oddly enough, there’s an established homeless shelter right next door to this church. Based on their sign and name, they’re also faith based. Were they full? Did they turn some people away for reasons of their own?

      I’m just very curious to hear more.

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    police department saw a spike in calls for service in May 2023 regarding “inappropriate activity” at Dad’s Place spanning criminal mischief, trespassing, overdose, larceny, harassment, disturbing the peace and sexual assault.

    Sounds like it wasn’t a problem until certain individuals started doing stupid stuff.

    Now the question is : how many calls were placed?

    • jettrscga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      They claim they saw more calls. I’m gonna call bullshit.

      police department saw a spike in calls for service in May 2023

      The city became aware that Dad’s Place was housing people in November

      Even giving them the benefit of the doubt, by their own admission it took their ace detectives 6 months of responding to calls before realizing what was happening there?

    • Norgur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      And: were those calls placed b the same people who then just happy to have a say in zoning violations.