• bender223@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 hours ago

    why do these so called captains of industry always sound like whiny little bitches? if they’re so smart, come up with a better solution

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Sam Altman has lost the plot.

    His own model of LLM isn’t sustainable or profitable, where the local software model us.

    And the economy isn’t there just to make Sam Altman richer.

    This is (another) Let them eat cake moment in which another spoiled aristocrat has lost touch with the common people.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The problem isn’t the AI, the issue is that the elites are trying to horde it and keep it from us little people. If we are to have agency, having personal ownership over local AI, collectively owned AI, and regulations, are all key to ensuring that democracy and egalitarianism is secure.

    The elite will not willingly surrender power, especially there is a void that they can colonize. Ordinary people like us should fill the vacuum, to deny the elite from having total control over AI.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 hours ago

    So we’d own a basic terminal, and pay a subscription for our computing needs.

    Gosh, who’d’a thunkit? Never saw that one coming.

  • luna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I just read an article yesterday about a young woman who passed away after following the advice of an AI to stop taking her medication. I simply don’t understand why these capitalists are always so intent on monopolizing the market and controlling people. Are they truly so foolish that they always assume they’re right about everything—as if they were omnipotent?

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The woman explicitly ignored her doctors though. It’s unfortunate and I think that model was flawed but it’s still a brain dead thing to do. At some point the benefits of helping millions outweigh some rare decisions and I’m not a corporate AI shill, an open source model would be just as susceptible to this scenario.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I simply don’t understand why these capitalists are always so intent on monopolizing the market and controlling people.

      Power and money. They’re real life super villains. It’s why most people run for politics or become cops. Some want to make the world better, most just want to control others because they’ve lacked any kind of control at home or through their lives.

  • SplitTheUSInFour@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Nope. We’re slamming out our software, canceling our accounts, and running things ourselves. Requires a lot less electricity and works faster. Efficiency is king in business. You sir, are inefficient and no one enjoys giving you their money.

    This idiot never learned the golden rule: everybody is using everybody. Even him. It’s within the customers right to do this themselves. Don’t play the game if you can’t handle the rules.

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Yeah with open models catching up and giving reasonable results in consumer grade setups, they are gonna go full on with “unregulated AI is too dangerous we should only allow hardware gated LLMs”.

    It is so funny this guy is the CEO of a company called openAI lol.