• omgboom@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    He owns over 410 million shares and is the largest single shareholder. That is an enormous amount

    • Oderus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s under 13% so while he’s the largest single owner, he still doesn’t own an enormous amount. He could easily be bought out.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          57 minutes ago

          For a publicly traded company? Yes that’s an enormous amount in that context.

          Isn’t it?

        • Oderus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I don’t know what the threshold would be… but it would have to be over 50%. If I own 13% of my house, I wouldn’t say I own an enormous amount. I would I own 1/8th my house, which is pretty meagre.

          • Jarix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            56 minutes ago

            Your house isn’t a publicly traded company. That makes a big difference in this context.

            • Oderus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              25 minutes ago

              Only if you really want it to be different is it different. The reality is, it’s not. Words have meaning and 1/8th is not enormous. It’s literally a small fraction of the total.