• Papaslair@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 minutes ago

    Carney should send a thank you note to Trump for helping him win the election

  • selkiesidhe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Meirdas Touch once again. The orange shit stain backs a Con and all voters take that as a sign that the person is a piece of shit and votes opposite.

    Sometimes it works nicely.

    • Kaput@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Top Poilievre defense he did use a lot of Trump’s talking points and techniques. Branding himself as Trump light.

    • PNW clouds@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I don’t know how it works there. Was Pierre running in two races?

      Would there have a special election for this seat if he had won both?

      What are the odds he loses support and goes quiet after losing both, especially his backup incumbent election? (Knowing hard losses used to discourage people, but not always now)

      • Someone@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        No one actually “runs for Prime Minister”. The Prime Minister is simply the leader of the governing party. That is determined by the number of seats each party wins. The PM is almost always an elected MP, but as demonstrated for the past few weeks they don’t have to be.

    • shawn1122@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Having a criminal history would likely make him ineligible.

      There’s no outright rule against it but several people have been removed from the order for committing crimes.

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      NDP leader already announced he’s stepping down and I feel like the conservative has to as well.

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I’m happy for you Canada.

    You succeeded where America couldn’t.

    Are y’all accepting asylum for programmers / tech professionals?

    • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If you’re serious, start looking for companies hiring up here. As I understand it’s not easy, even for economic class immigrants, but I work in tech and I work with many immigrants (albeit not usually from the US, but it’s a different world now). Mind you - please look carefully into the financial impacts as it is a change from the US. Salaries are lower and taxes generally higher, which may or may not be offset in your context in other ways (healthcare a big one, income tax deductions, etc.) But many people, myself included, prefer Canada regardless of the reduced compensation. It’s not always about money.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Asylum, not yet. There’s still a treat on the books recognising America as equivalently safe. Presumably it will get rolled back soon.

      If you’re serious, I can send you to the points quiz for economic immigrants.

      • shawn1122@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        What happens when a ‘safe third country’ starts adopting extractionary systems left behind by colonial empires that have, in part, held back third world economies for decades? Keep an eye on America to find out!

        I’m sure America’s substantial purchasing power will help prevent the rot from spreading within. Right? Right?!

      • Routhinator@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Even more unaffordable for an American. They need to have bankroll to survive a year without income and that includes covering possible medical expenses for 3 months. I have friends who have wanted to move here for years and the hurdles are large even with skills and secondary education. Only those with highly in demand educated skills get an easier path.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No different in America, and corporations are buying up homes so they can jack the prices up even higher. MAGA wants a population of renters so that they can control us by threatening us with homelessness.

    • twice_hatch@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I can but they won’t let my friends in. I didn’t realize until I looked into it but national borders are actually quite rigid

      • HalfSalesman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You’d have to build new roots in a new place. I’ll admit I worry that I’m running out of time for that at my age, or at the very least the window is closing.

        Makes me feel pretty depressed. I’m not super happy with the landscape of people I have to interact with. I have a lot of decent friends but I feel like the number of very close friendships I have is zero due to a lot of major value differences and low population.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I’m feeling the same way. I’ve been mostly “stuck” in wherever I just ended up. Part of me really does fantasize about fleeing somewhere better, especially being in a part of the US with an absolutely abysmal education record (and it shows. Oh boy.)

          But besides the resources, I don’t have some ultra compelling reason for a non-volatile nation to bother letting me in.

          There’s cool people here, and I try to get along with whomever, but forming relationships feels really high stakes these days since contested politics and tribalism is infecting every facet of peoples’ lives.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    this outcome has less to do with trump’s actions, and more to do with how the conservatives behaved in spite of those actions.

    I think enough people were like me, ready to vote conservative, but then lost faith in the party since they didnt really seem to have a plan on anything once trudeau was gone early. Pollievre’s stock tanked once people saw that Trudeau was gone, and what was happening in the world

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Genuine question, what initially led you to wanting to vote conservative and what could they have run on for you to have stuck with then?

    • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I don’t know that ‘Conservative’ exists anymore. I’m American, but I think these comments work everywhere else, as Authoritarianism rises.

      Growing up, I believed that liberal/conservative was just a difference in approach, but not a difference in end-goal. Both ‘teams’ wanted the country to prosper. In my 40s, now, I clearly see that we have different goals: Liberals want everyone to be prosperous, healthy, fulfilled. Conservatives value the prosperity only of those on top.

      You may identify as conservative, little ‘c’, respect tradition and be careful with spending, etc; but I want you to closely evaluate the actions of people using that label across the globe. A vote for a conservative or right-wing candidate is a vote for the top 1% or less of the population of the planet. They may align with you on some topics, such as religion, abortion, fiscal policies, regulations, and more; but that is a ploy and they are absolutely willing to throw you away as soon as they have your vote and will cut everything you depend on once in power in order to pad their own pockets.

      There are certainly perverse incentives and systemic issues that make even liberal politicians support bad policies, but the voter bloc that is ‘liberal’ wants to make things better for everyone. The conservative politicians, at least in the US where I’m paying attention, seem to be hell-bent on making things worse instead.

      This has less to do with Trump’s actions, and more to do with how the convervatives behaved…

      • shawn1122@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        This has been my experience as well and I’d like to highlight your insightful point on how it seemed like both options were still trying to work towards a greater good decades ago.

        Modern day conservatism seems entirely based on the ethos that inclusivity has gone too far. Since the world has become (in a very general and oversimplfying sense) more fair and inclusive over time, the ideology now feels inherently regressive.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The line between regressive and conservative is so hard to define. However the former certainly is in ascendancy in America.

    • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Explain how they gained more seats then.

      The conservatives barely lost because the progressives and the BQ voters cut their legs off to hoist up the liberals.

      • Kaput@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        We’ll see if the liberals take Quebec for granted like NDP did after Layton.

        • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          That’ll be important. We’ll also see how Canadians react to the atrocities the USA will commit in the next 4 years too however.

  • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Ironically, Trudeau hanging around for a long as he did may have saved Canada. If this election had happened in the middle of last year, the Conservatives would have probably won and combined with Trump, it would have been a disaster. Possibly the smartest/luckiest thing he has ever done.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        in this case it was the early voter turnout and the special ballots that really lifted it. And we cannot ever forget Bloc. They did a huge push on this one. No one hates Trump quite as much as Quebecois and they showed it 20 fold. Quite a ride watching all this. Especially what with the cyber attacks on the PM during this short campaign was relentless as was the propaganda radios. It honestly should be a case study on how out of control the propaganda was getting on X and facebook.