Yes, without hesitation, although I’d want to rinse it first to avoid cross-contamination.

Banana picking and shipping as it usually happens isn’t exactly sterile, either. Or the grocery store where everyone is picking through them. This is also why you should wash anything you don’t peel.

Yeah, I futzed with it a bit. At first I did sesquicentennial, but that’s purely an adjective which isn’t great. Sesquicentenary refers to the day, so that wouldn’t work. So, I made a nonce word which, if you know these other two, is clear.

I’ll just ignore the insulting tone.

They addressed that, actually.

True to the spirit of journalistic inquiry, your correspondent can attest that seawater has not degraded the taste of the bananas, with the only threats to health posed by skin slippage and by eating too many of them.

Definitely peel it first.

I mean, that was slightly fictional, although that’s the maybe the joke. And set a sesquicentury ago.

I feel like those situations are already life-threatening to some degree, so I’ll take my chances.

I’d assume growth over the course of just exiting a car wouldn’t be too significant.

Ah shit, why didn’t I think of that?

You would have to cover everything including your face, though, and that can get you funny looks in a different way.

If it’s toy dino-speed, you’ll be significantly taller after a longer shower, but not giant, and nothing will break. If I actually do the thing from the Spongebob opening on contact with water I’d reconsider.

Intelligence does seem like the white-collar kind of thing which might be left to fancy degreed officers.

As far as I can tell most synagogues aren’t that cool, though. The ones remotely nearby to me give Zionist vibes.

It’s a shame, I was planning to reconnect with my heritage right before Oct. 7.

Absolutely fascinating, thanks for sharing!

I didn’t know military intelligence had noncoms. How does that work?

Dying naturally tends to be an excruciatingly painful and slow process.

eating, drinking water, moving out of the way of danger, etc.

Not eating and drinking is a definite thing.

It’s night half the time, and I’ll be really visible if I’m glowing whether I want to be or not. So, definitely the second one. Prolonged water contact in a visible place is easier to avoid, if needed.

I plan to re-enact Gulliver pulling along the Lilliputian armada.

Does one of them have alsimoneau’s number in it (that’s who I meant)? You yourself gave a number closer to 15%.

I mean, it’s not that expensive to start an exit node, and requires “only” knowhow to mess with someone’s unencrypted browsing, which is what the first and third did. I can’t remember now if Onymous actually managed to break Tor anonymity - I’m pretty sure good-old-fashioned stings turned out to be a big part of it.

IIRC the two-node timing attack I was thinking of was an academic demonstration. Because it’s too non-specific to be very useful.

That excerpt still says it was deployed to all the businesses listed above it, though. So yes it was being used however those businesses used it.

It was in the OpenSSL (for example) as an option you could manually enable. Who knows if anyone actually did, given that everyone who knew enough to specifically ask also heard it was suspicious.

Post the next paragraph too.

Moreover, the algorithm had been shown to be insecure in 2007 by Microsoft cryptographers Niels Ferguson and Dan Shumow, added Mr Clayton.

“Because the vulnerability was found some time ago, I’m not sure if anybody is using it,” he said.

But your comment implied that because it is open source it automatically means that it is safe and trustworthy and that isn’t true.

Well, your comment implied that OP shouldn’t trust Tor. OP should trust Tor at least as much as they trust their own device, which almost certainly has closed-source components I’d rather target if I was the NSA. (Or the Chinese, or…)

Since this user wanted an in depth conversation on the topic I don’t feel like its “ritualistic purity” to disclose all that I said above.

Except in-depth isn’t what was offered. This reply appears all the time in regards to Tor, and it never comes with alternative suggestions. So yeah, I suspect something irrational is motivating it.

But most people who looked at the NSA’s backdoored encryption noticed it was sus and didn’t use it (as I remember it, that was a decade ago). Per your link, at the time of publishing it was unclear if anyone was using the effected version.

Okay, sure. Open source doesn’t mean completely safe, but if it’s a well-known package it does mean much, much safer. Public public affiliations don’t even say much about who authored whatever thing; here’s a another near-miss that illustrates that - which is why this can feel more like ritual purity than an actual security argument.

So what should OP use?

Like, every service by law being available in both seems like overkill. It’s good to have services available in other languages than English, so there’s no reason to shut it down proactively, but native languages, Mandarin and Punjabi seem like equally major priorities without Quebec.

I suppose French on every label would also be overdoing it, by that logic, although without that it would feel less like home.