• ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      There are so many high quality rips out there. Bothering to rip these yourself makes not much sense, unless its very obscure stuff.

      • nyan@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s the letter of the law: media shifting is legal in some places where downloading a copy from an unofficial site is not. Also, there are people out there who would not have the first idea where to look for an existing rip.

        • ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          I don’t know the situation in all of the countries, but the ones I know that allow you to make a copy of what you purchased also require that in making a copy you are not allowed to break any DRM. I don’t think there are many media being sold that do not include some kind of DRM these days.

          Edit: agree that people may not know how to pirate stuff but ripping something in decent enough quality also requires quite specialist knowledge.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        …unless its very obscure stuff.

        That’s primarily why you’d be ripping stuff. There is so much stuff only available on VHS and DVD.

      • alcoholic_chipmunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Most rips tend to apply some compression. Ripping them yourself will generally give you a better result unless you also intend to compress them.

    • doodledup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I gave up encoding with handbrake. It looks much worse after the fact 99% of the time, no matter which settings I use.

      • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m not sure what you were trying, but this works for me:

        Never use hardware encoding. That is intended for real time transcoding. There are not many settings that work since it is just sending the file to the video card and letting it do its thing.

        Slower is better. If you set the software encoder to very slow it will produce an output that is very high quality per megabyte. I generally don’t care if it takes twice as long to encode it as to watch it. I queue it up and let it run over night.

        Choose the right codec. I like 10 bit HEVC, because I know it will work on the clients I play it from. When you rip a DVD using MakeMKV, the video will be MPEG-2, it was designed in the 1990’s and converting the file to a modern codec will save a lot of space. I don’t reencode 4K UHD rips much since I don’t want to mess with losing the hdr or other color features that I like in watching those files.

        Audio tracks: I will rip out audio for languages I don’t speak, or desctiptive audio track, but go out of my way to label things like director commentaries. I don’t reencode the audio tracks at all, you won’t save much disk space by messing with them compared to the video tracks.

        • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Be sure to use constant quality mode too. Set the RF to around 16-18 for SD video when using x264 or x265. The lower you set it, the higher the quality is.