I have recently become more aware of and generally interested in electronics and amateur radio, and it got me thinking. What advantage, if any, would there be to having amateur radio experience, over a simple disaster crank radio/flashlight, in the event of a major natural disaster or some other emergency that leads to a longer delay in power being restored? For the sake of argument, let’s assume you have a generator or battery bank to supply your own electricity.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    If you are the one with power in your local community with power, then HAM is far, far, far more important than CB.

    If your local community is out of power then you won’t really have many more people in the local area to communicate with, but with HAM you can reach across vast distances and manage way more resources between different local communities to deal with the crisis.

    In a local community, radio comms is a nice to have, over vast distances it is critical.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      When the problems are local, not over long distances, it’s more important having a local connection.

      For example, during Hurricane Katrina, police band radio was being broadcast over the internet. The most heartbreaking call I personally heard from the stadium was an officer begging “Does anyone know how to deliver a baby?”

      Getting that message out over long distances did not help the situation. Getting it out locally DID.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Just because a signal may have a long range, doesn’t mean it can’t be intercepted locally.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          No, it would depend on someone else locally having a similar rig and there are far more people with CB radios than HAM radios.

          https://rrra.org/post/2024/01/19/zero-retries-on-saving-amateur-radio/

          The numbers of Amateur Radio Operators (not just in the US) are declining.

          The influence of the ARRL will inevitably decline as a result of disgust at the Board of Directors infighting and dues (subscription) price increases.

          The use of voice VHF / UHF repeaters are significantly reduced, year to year.

          Emergency Communications has subtly become less of a justification for Amateur Radio. Simultaneously …

          In the 2020s and beyond, First Responders have more, and more reliable communications options than ever before.

          Communications infrastructure available to most individuals has become more concentrated and fragile.

          COVID-19 and other factors have impacted many Amateur Radio club meetings and other reasons for Amateur Radio in-person events.

          The potential audience of younger folks to become new Amateur Radio Operators just don’t find “talking to strangers” or “operating on shortwave” to be compelling reasons to become Amateur Radio Operators.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            No, it would depend on someone else locally having a similar rig and there are far more people with CB radios than HAM radios.

            That’s actually false. The supporting arguments you have provided are reasonable, but they ignore the fact that CBs have declined far faster than amateur radio.