• DBT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        This is something I do not wish to google. Is it noticeable? I would assume a small surgical cut that occurs at infancy leaves no significant scar

        • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          42
          ·
          11 months ago

          Not to be crude but this pretty much is what I’m talking about. It’s almost like having a two toned penis…

          NSFW btw… Although it is just a drawing

          • Rev3rze@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            61
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Wow the frenulum gets removed as well sometimes? What an outdated and ridiculous thing to be doing to children for absolutely no good reason. Yeah sure, some studies show it improves hygiene I’ve been told. To me that’s about as proportionate as removing all your healthy teeth so you don’t get cavities in the future…

            • Risk@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              60
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              The studies where it ‘improves’ hygiene are poorly designed as they don’t control for education and understanding.

              In other words - what’s better: teaching our baby boys the simple act of cleaning under their foreskin in the bath, along with the rest of their body or cutting off a sensitive and important part of their body to make masturbation and sex more difficult?

          • adj16@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            11 months ago

            Ok wait the rest of this is important but sidebar, my peehole is called a MEATUS??

        • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Let’s just say there is a definitive line where what once was my foreskin now just is a smooth piece of skin connected by another. I wouldn’t call it a scar because like I said I had no idea it was not normal. There’s definitely a noticeable difference between the top part and the rest of it. I’m not sure how else to put this delicately. Honestly, I would just google it.

      • corus_kt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        I can understand why people might not notice, most of my research sources are heavily pixelated.

      • DBT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean I’ve seen lots of porn and never noticed anything that looked like a scar, but then again I don’t typically focus on the dick.

        • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          As a rampant homosexual who’s done lots of dick-focused study - there’s a scar and it has different levels of noticability. Some are faint, some jagged, some with mismatched colours, some bright red, etc.

          Like any scar it can be very variable.

          • DBT@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yea I got it with the two tone Malone comment. That’s my G.

            But I appreciate yours as well.