Google announced Tuesday that early next year it would turn off artificial intelligence tools in its popular software for K-12 students, unless school administrators explicitly choose to make such tools available. Executives at the tech giant said they wanted to be responsive to educators and parents who have asked for more control in how children interact with A.I. But there is a catch: Schools that choose to restrict A.I. entirely will also lose access to Google search.

A.I. features are now a standard part of Google’s commercially available search engine. “Search and A.I. are deeply integrated,” said Chris Phillips, vice president for education at Google. If a school has banned A.I., he added, students “will not have access to search, and they’ll see a message from their school that indicates it’s not available.” Google is by far the dominant technology player in K-12 classrooms. Google’s suite of education apps — including Gmail, Docs and an assignment platform called Classroom — is ubiquitous. Google Chromebooks, low-cost laptops, are the most widely issued student devices in U.S. schools. And Google is synonymous with internet search, a crucial tool for students across the globe.

The company’s new strategy underscores Google’s powerful role in American education. If school leaders want continued student access to search within the company’s ecosystem, they will be forced to embrace Google’s A.I. In recent months, Google has been promoting its Gemini chatbot as a valuable educational tool, saying it can aid teachers in planning lessons and serve as a personalized tutor for students. A new student version of Gemini, Guided Learning, is supposed to make it harder for students to use A.I. to cheat.

“We’re evolving our approach,” said Mr. Phillips. He promised tools that would “support the productive struggle” of learning and tamp down on students turning to A.I. for easy answers. In August, Google turned on A.I. features as the default option inside its Classroom app for K-12 schools that had allowed students separate access to the company’s Gemini chatbot. The move upset some school leaders, who felt schools should be able to decide how and when students used Google’s A.I.

Google’s August change will now be reversed.

A parent movement has been pushing back against the use of A.I. in schools, and against screen time more generally. While A.I. chatbots can be useful tools for research and coding, they can also easily be used to cheat on school assignments and can provide false information. Research shows chatbots can also hinder critical thinking and ensnare adolescents in emotional dependency.

Last week, New York State passed a chatbot safety law that would prohibit companies from providing a variety of A.I. features for minors. And in September, the nation’s two largest school districts, in New York City and Los Angeles — both Google clients — broadly restricted student access to generative artificial intelligence on school devices. Officials in the Los Angeles Unified School District said at the time that they were hoping students would be able to conduct Google searches with A.I. overviews turned off. The overviews are A.I.-generated summaries that appear at the top of searches. They can dissuade students from seeking out multiple sources of information. On Monday, Google executives said that for districts that choose to allow A.I., there will be two options for search inside school-issued accounts, beginning in early 2027. One option will be search with A.I. overviews and A.I. chats turned on, similar to the current consumer experience. The other will be search using Guided Learning, the student version of Google’s Gemini chatbot.

Guided Learning is intended to guide students through a topic step-by-step without providing them with answers that could short-circuit learning. It is supposed to offer an experience modeled on one-to-one tutoring.

The consumer version of Guided Learning is already available within Gemini, and can enable cheating. In a reporter’s test, it produced a detailed essay in response to an Advanced Placement history prompt.

There are greater restrictions in the school version that is currently being piloted, according to Brit Mennuti, product lead for Google Classroom. She said teachers would be able to review students’ chatbot transcripts, among other capabilities.

  • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    Man, I used to love using Googles ecosystem but recently on Chromecast YouTube they started pushing non skippable politics adds at me like gangbusters… That was the last straw. Finally got all ads out of YT and stopped using Gboard and went back to FF. Getting out of Gmail next. Enough is enough.

  • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Lol great buisness plan, force schools to find alternatives and act suprised when students continue to use those alternatives into their adult life.

    • jmill@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That was my first thought, I approve of this plan. I hope it’s the beginning of their financial decline, coming too long after their moral one.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      TBF, just kick google out and add real Linux.

      Chromebooks are not good job training. Macs/Windows/Linux are

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Windows is not. There’s no value added.

        It’s been known for a long time that what students learn in schools have a major influence on the tools they advocate for at their future workplaces. So getting students used to and familiar with Linux would help with corporate inroads.

      • pikl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        If tech support is the intended training, my kids are getting plenty from their Chromebooks.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Currently, getting tech support training on a Chromebook only prepares you for a school-based IT job. Given, that’s not nothing.

  • Oh_Sheila@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I hope schools reject Google. They’ve indoctrinated them into using Google products long enough. I’ve witnessed kids not knowing what the address bar is or a URL, only referring to it as Google search. Many can’t navigate a real computer if they grew up only using the school chromebooks. This has to change

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Also not just a google problem. Kids raised on apps don’t really understand file structures, so if they can’t find a photo in the photo folder or pretty much anything else in the download folder, they don’t know what to do.

      • perturbedstarstuff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        15 hours ago

        To be fair to them the default with “user friendly” phone UI makes it difficult to have any idea where things are. You often really have to go out of your way to open a file manager.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        18 hours ago

        They should bring back computer classes in school.

        The entire point of a school is to learn, and learning how to computer is an excellent thing to have.

        • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          And it may as well put them on Linux. All the UI in Windows and Apple has flumoxed users from underlying architecture.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      1 day ago

      Member when software companies offered ultra cheap student licenses because they recognized the long term value of a student learning and getting accustomed to their program? I member.

      This seems very, very shortsighted.

      • assembly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Exactly this! Imagine a whole generation associating search with DDG or Kagi? That would really move the needle in the future regarding tech adoption to alternative platforms

        • Pratai@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I guarantee you DDG and Kagi will do the exact same thing when they become the only shows in town

          Does “do no evil” ring a bell??

      • anewfox@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        22 hours ago

        github had (has?) free pro accounts for students back when github didn’t offer private repos for free. if you forgot to cancel your student account when you graduated, github would simply hold your private repos hostage unless you paid for them. no option given to simply make them public repos. i would have lost mountains of my work had they not fucked up and unlocked my repos for a couple hours, which allowed me to clone everything i didn’t have locally and migrate to gitlab.

        so basically, sometimes those student offers build in scam tactics.

        • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          How is that a scam tactic? You got access to private repos for some amount of time. It is clear to any reasonable person that you would lose access after the pro version ends.

          If you didn’t want your repos to be “held hostage”, just clone them before the subscription expires.

          I benefitted from student GitHub pro too, and I used it knowing that the day would come where my free subscription would end and I’d lose access to it.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            that would be fair if they would just be barred from making additional changes, issues and comments. or if they deleted the data. that would even free up storage at github. but no. they kept the data in the hopes students will pay to access their own content, and then perhaps forget to cancel the subscription.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            that would be fair if they would just be barred from making additional changes, issues and comments. or if they deleted the data. that would even free up storage at github. but no. they kept the data in the hopes students will pay to access their own content, and then perhaps forget to cancel the subscription.

      • tburkhol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Student discounted software started when most of the corporate world was still using typewriters and paper. Students learned the new-fangled software and carried into their new jobs.

        Today, those same businesses rely on Microsoft Office and Google search, and those monopolies are obviously going to leverage their monopolies to force AI, Teams, or whatever other Next Big Thing onto unwilling schools.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yeah oh noo, google is forfeiting its market stranglehold by making stupid executive decisions. What are we going to do… 🙄

  • o8bepbua9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m sure it’s a tactic to make the schools allow AI, but I hope they can resist. Google does not need a stranglehold on every person in every market. Google search has gotten worse anyway, so even duck duck go would be fine. Maybe even use this as an opportunity to teach kids about data privacy.

    • LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Might also be an attempt to keep their Search numbers up. I saw an article recently that AI is hurting Google Search because of the lack of click through due to AI summaries.

      By packaging them together they get to boost both options through a semi-captive audience.

  • Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Just use DuckDuckGo with all AI stuff turned off. If google thinks it is a great idea to remove itself from pupils and schools, their choice.

  • Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I feel bad for kids still learning in the formative years

    So much has changed and I fear it has been for the worse. At least in the US they are trying their hardest to dismantle education