ekZepp@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoWhat Refutes Science...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up11.21Karrow-down116
arrow-up11.19Karrow-down1imageWhat Refutes Science...lemmy.worldekZepp@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square75fedilink
minus-squarewill_a113@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·2 days agook, but what about three Youtube videos?
minus-squareMr Fish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·2 days agoAs long as they’re shorts, only showing one vague, unverifiable, third or fourth hand anecdote each.
minus-squareRemember_the_tooth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 days agoThat makes sense. I heard that my college roommate’s pen pal said something like that.
minus-squareRemember_the_tooth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 days agoAre they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody, because if not, you can miss with that.
minus-squarewill_a113@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days ago Are they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody Is there any other kind?
minus-squareSlovene@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoMaybe, if they’re from potholer54
minus-squarePhoenixz@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoAll hail potholer54! The guy is awesome
ok, but what about three Youtube videos?
As long as they’re shorts, only showing one vague, unverifiable, third or fourth hand anecdote each.
That makes sense. I heard that my college roommate’s pen pal said something like that.
Are they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody, because if not, you can miss with that.
Is there any other kind?
Maybe, if they’re from potholer54
All hail potholer54! The guy is awesome