• rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      My guess is lower. I’d put the correlation at about -.35 to -.45, so that’d correspond to an R² of .1225 to .2025. But eyeballing correlations is hard.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Assuming it’s a correction line, I don’t think you can tell from the slope of that line alone as the clustering will matter and correlations are finicky. Now, if it was a regression coefficient, that sexy line can be calculated just by looking at it (although we’d want to know if it was significant, lol).

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        I was assuming its a simple linear regression fit, and attempting to eyeball the r², haha.

    • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Delete enough data points and it will be 1. You’ll only have two data points, but you’ll have bragging rights.