They said it’s “false” that the killer was motivated by something else. It’s not false, it’s unknown, because there isn’t enough information to actually be confident about that. People trying to give a misleading sense of their motives to throw investigations off when committing crimes is something that happens. If you think there is enough information, that’s more of an opinion than a fact.
Why would we ignore facts on the ground? Do you have any better facts?
They said it’s “false” that the killer was motivated by something else. It’s not false, it’s unknown, because there isn’t enough information to actually be confident about that. People trying to give a misleading sense of their motives to throw investigations off when committing crimes is something that happens. If you think there is enough information, that’s more of an opinion than a fact.