My yard is not public.

This Maddrey cunt sounds like a bad egg, but why the fuck is a cop making $400k a year?! I don’t doubt that the sexual harassment took place, but I also think that Epps may have also been abusing overtime as accused to get to those numbers.

They’re both cops, so both are probably in the wrong, but if the sexual harassment accusations are true, Maddrey truly takes the cake for being worse.

There’s at least one in my neighborhood, I think more, that have left piles in my yard. I need to set up a camera so I can rehydrate and aggressively return to the sender’s front door.

First thing I do on a new phone regarding any messaging if to disable that feature. I don’t want people thinking I’m ignoring them, but I also don’t want people to know that I’m ignoring them.

Since when has the far right been the party of driving vehicles into crowds with intent to harm? What is this new, never happened before craziness?

I personally will never consider a product he’s attached to.

The “something” is where the regex goes. For simple cases contains by itself does just fine, but for almost anything kind of dynamic input, it’s going to not be capable of what regex does.

Also, fuck Elon.

Assuming “text” in your example is a placeholder for a 5 digit alpha string, it can be written like this in regex: /[a-zA-Z0-9]{5}/

If ”text" is literal, then your statement is impossible.

I think that when it gets to more complex expressions like a phone number with country code that accepts different formats, the verbosity of a higher level language will be more confusing, or at least more difficult to take in quickly.

How do you think that would look? Regex isn’t particularly complicated, just a bit to remember. I’m trying to picture how you would represent a regex expression in a higher level language. I think one of its biggest benefits is the ability to shove so much information into a random looking string. I suppose you could write functions like, startswith, endswith, alpha(4), or something like that, but in the end, is that better?

Somebody’s a little upset that their general is dead. Cry about it some more.

The good old Oedipus complex, where you mean one thing but fuck your mother.

Just get the picture. Nobody cares what you driver’s license picture looks like.

I got carpet burn on my lip the day before mine years ago when I slipped grabbing a tow rope. I’ve had a couple of pictures since then. Now it’s just a fun memory.

Nah, children fucking suck. All of them. I was born and raised in the middle of the US and since I was young I knew I never wanted children. I wouldn’t be a good parent so it would be unfair to bring a human into this shitty world and then have them rely on me to raise them. It’s irresponsible and quite frankly unethical to have kids just because procreation is necessary for the human species to to grow. There are plenty of people that want them that the rest of us aren’t required for sustainability.

The world could use a couple of billion less people anyway.

They are inadvertently. Corporations say the right words and the pro2a people fall in line. Look at all of the millions of citizens that voted directly against their best interests in November because they’ve effectively been fed messages that made them disregard what actually effects them. Obviously not all pro2a people are in this camp, but there’s a lot of overlap between those folks and people getting manipulated by other rich and powerful forces.

More people watch <insert any sport here> than they play it.

We know what the meant by the word they chose to use. They specifically said “unhoused”. Your insinuation is that the author doesn’t know what they’re talking about and may have used the wrong word instead of believing they know what they’re doing.

You’re the one being nitpicky on details by your original response when you were critical of the word choice. We’re educating you that there is in fact a difference and that the OG headline is accurate. That hurts your butt.

Are you suggesting that the incorrect terms should be used to cater to those of you that don’t know there is a difference? Even if you were unaware that there is actually a difference, was the intent and meaning of the headline lost in confusion, or did you understand exactly what they meant?

I would guess most of them being shipped out also don’t have many of the facts about the invasion, the reason for it, or how it’s been going.

It’s a long article that I admittedly didn’t read all of. I got to the part where it said the details of his algorithm are basically unknown, which means his data means nothing. If someone can’t provide the proof to their claims, they have no merit.

An LLM that’s built entirely on code repo data, and is somehow claiming workers “do virtually nothing” without any sort of outside data, is insane.