• rigo@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I can’t imagine thinking so much of yourself that you need to use AI to release a new song in this manner. It’s wild.

  • Soltros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’ll be interesting to hear. However, I really hope someone doesn’t buy the rights to the Beatles and start generating new albums when Paul and Ringo are gone. It’ll be soulless.

  • Briongloid@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    From what I’ve gathered, it was just AI to clean up a track that was previously too poorly recorded to release.

    It’s not synthesised, it’s just repaired.

    • Jarmo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Interesting, I wonder why this couldn’t be accomplished with conventional techniques. I own a handful of “AI” Plugins meant to achieve similar cleanup and I feel like it always needs to be tweaked to sound right. And that’s for a guy like me without practiced mixing ears. I wonder why real studio engineers needed AI.

      • Briongloid@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It was likely a combination of AI and manual tuning, like with modern photoshop plugins.

        AI in this usecase is another tool for the engineer.