Announced in early August and initially planned for the end of the month, the Fedora Asahi Remix distribution is finally here for those who want to install the Fedora Linux operating system on their Apple Silicon Macs.

The distro is based on the latest Fedora Linux 39 release and ships with the KDE Plasma 5.27 LTS desktop environment by default, using Wayland.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would install this if I had made the objectively wrong decision to buy an apple computer.

    • magikmw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It makes a second hand mac viable for me. The hardware is nice, it was always the OS that made me avoid it.

      • Shareni@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I really wouldn’t touch secondhand Ms. No upgrades, no repairs, horrible components (CPU is ok, everything else is straight from the dumpster in order to cover costs).

        So when something dies on your device from a company that has a long history of terrible design and QA (I’m betting on storage) you have to pay another $1000+ to replace the whole motherboard. On top of that, I’m guessing that they’re also ripping off customers when selling those replacement boards, as having usable ram and storage costs an extra $1000+ when buying new.

        • bruhduh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This, I’ve tried to look up spare ssd and ram chips for apple arm laptops to reball and resolder them and couldn’t find any

          • Shareni@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Inb4 apple locked down components to motherboard serial number

            But seriously, I guess the only hope is to wait for the Chinese second hand market takes off.

            • bruhduh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I know that iPhones do that but about MacBook i didn’t know until your message

              • Shareni@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It was a joke. But you can see why I wouldn’t be surprised if it turns out true in the end.

                I know for a fact they’re making it impossible to make small repairs like changing the screen closed sensor. It requires a proprietary calibration tool they won’t sell, and so MacBooks can’t go to sleep when closing the screen.

                On top of changing it from a sub $ hall sensor to some proprietary bs that’s far more expensive.

        • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would never buy something new from Apple as I don’t like them, but I have to admit that their hardware feels great to use. I’m not tech savvy enough to know where that would be coming from, but it makes me wonder how people could say that the components are so bad.

          My girlfriend has a 2012 MacBook Pro and I put Fedora on it and it feels like such a great machine. The ram and the hard drive have been upgraded, but it feels incredible for an old machine.

          If in 10 years you can get an old MacBook Pro for 200$, I might jump on it even if upgradeability has been lowered.

          • Shareni@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            their hardware feels great to use

            I tried using a friend’s m1 MacBook pro, and it’s the worst laptop I’ve touched in a while. Like my oldest budget core2duo laptop has a better keyboard than a brand new $2000+ device. There’s a very good reason it’s permanently docked.

            it makes me wonder how people could say that the components are so bad.

            I’ve mentioned a few reasons in this thread. They basically used subpar components to offset the cost of developing their own CPU.

            If in 10 years you can get an old MacBook Pro for 200$, I might jump on it even if upgradeability has been lowered.

            It’s not lowered, it’s absolutely removed, unless you count replacing the entire motherboard as upgradeability.

            16gb ram is too small? New motherboard.

            Crappy SSD is dying? New motherboard.

        • magikmw@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Haven’t dug into it yet, but if that’s right then not great. Then again if something doesn’t break quickly in electronics it usually works fine for years, except maybe overheated GPUs, random RAM and HDDs.

          I’m still unsure if I want to replace my 2016 Asus zenbook. Other than the aged CPU/AGPU from Intel, and unusable from the start touchpad it’s fine.

          • Shareni@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            When m1 came out, some tech guy on twitter did a review of MacBook Pro and studio storage. Apple literally used components that are so bad they had to disable data safety protocols to go above HDD speeds. The end result was that losing power is likely to corrupt your data.

            Besides that apple was cutting out “unnecessary” parts of the arm specification in order to cut costs. The result is that the first 2(?) generations have hardware level exploit “m1racles” on top of others like “pacman”.

            I really wouldn’t trust them to last

      • Grass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would if the particular hardware had no inherent or user caused issues and the price was reasonable compared to other purchase candidates, but it rarely is. It would also need to be Linux compatible too because the os has always been insufferable and praised by insufferable people that need something to feel superior about with zero justification.

        The PowerPC days were pretty crap though even though the hardware was visually pleasing. Nobody made PowerPC compatible software. This time I guess apple is paying fees to arm and at least has arm compatibility. x86 is irritating in its own right too. Man, tech has gone in all sorts of shitty directions.

    • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      they are downvoting you, but you’re absolutely right.

      they can’t hardly be repaired and it’s impossible to upgrade them at all, even something as basic as swapping the SSD needs desoldering. They are still sold with 8 GB of RAM as the base and they can’t be upgraded.

      it isn’t worth it at all.

      • pftbest@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just don’t buy an 8gb model, easy fix) But seriously when you get a laptop which allows you to work 8 hours straight from battery and then have 30% capacity left at the end of a day, there is no chance you would get back to the Intel system and plug it in every 2 hours.

    • pftbest@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Current apple systems are objectively superior. The display image quality is better than competition, the touchpad hardware is better, CPU is top 1 in the world in single thread performance and the battery life is unrivaled.

      If you talk about the repairability it only matters in case it breaks and it only happens to a small % of the owners. Most people won’t need to repair it. However you do use your device every day, so why would you give up the better user experience? Because of a small chance you would need to pay for repairs later, or even at all? It doesn’t make sense.

      The same argument applies to upgrades as well. If you think you’ll need an upgrade just buy a bigger version from the start. It may be more expensive but once again you get a better experience overall.

      • Grass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly the drivel they want you to believe. I’m sorry but even if 8gb of ram performs like 16gb on other computers, which is a load of hot shit, it shouldn’t cost more than 32gb on other computers. The markup on parts for basic specs config is utterly insane. I highly doubt the average apple used actually benefits from the top single thread performance, and all of humanity’s battery tech is still awful at it’s best both in capability and environmental impact, not to mention capability per dollar.

        I have used apple hardware and software from the beige plastic days until the first laptops, and tried out Mac os and ios every major update, and found it to be entirely unenjoyable even when ignoring what is essentially DRM for hardware components on the phones forcing you to pay for repairs when it’s an easy diy otherwise.

        Really the apple elitism is bizarre beyond belief. You get to be in the cool dude club for getting scammed into paying 3-5 times the cost of each individual component you can choose higher version of in there config before buying. It’s like the million dollar gold bar app on early app store, except apple wants to be the only one making that kind of easy money off of their users.

        • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Overpriced for what they are? Agreed. Weird elitism from some of the user base? Absolutely.

          You sound almost as zealous when you say:

          tried out Mac os and ios every major update, and found it to be entirely unenjoyable

          I get that it’s not for you which is fine, but you tried every release of MacOS and iOS and hated them all? Okay bud.

          • Grass@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I wouldn’t say hated, but definitely possessing of many ui/UX choices that were about as well thought out as how windows had old/new control panel plus the new new settings app and yet everything was still counterintuitive. I merely gave it a chance repeatedly because I ran a computer business up until covid hit and needed basic familiarity, and people kept telling me it was better than everything else and really if you don’t game it mostly is for many workloads, but I still found things to be rather clunky especially system navigation on iOS. Not saying android is better or anything either because while it suits me more, there is so much infuriating dumb shit.

            Basically because of every other offering feeling like it’s ripping me off, Linux being free and having tons of customization beyond simply cosmetic and several people making different solutions to each problem most of the time and also free, coming back to anything else with any combination of hardware, software, and money entry barriers just feels like the worst value proposition possible. Maybe if I was born into wealth and a social media addict I would have been an apple fanboy.