• awfulawful@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Finding arguments unconvincing would still be definitionally agnostic. To be a gnostic atheist, you have to posit an argument that no deity/whatever could exist, not just that’s it’s exceedingly unlikely.

    • texture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      deleted comment -

      i had misread this part here “To be a gnostic atheist” and attempted to politely correct what i misread as “agnostic atheist” my bad. good comment!