Zagorath@aussie.zone to Running@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoOut-and-Back Routes Are Better Than Loops for Long Runs. Prove Me Wrong. | Runner's Worldwww.runnersworld.comexternal-linkmessage-square14linkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down13
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkOut-and-Back Routes Are Better Than Loops for Long Runs. Prove Me Wrong. | Runner's Worldwww.runnersworld.comZagorath@aussie.zone to Running@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square14linkfedilink
minus-squareIlandar@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI’d argue Adelaide’s is better because it is an actual place-to-place name, as opposed to Sydney’s which is just made up AFAIK. But I am very biased!
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zoneOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI’m a sucker for alliteration, what can I say. But I guess that makes Bridge to Brisbane the perfect name. It’s alliterative and describes exactly what the race is (in its new and old-old form…the old-new route was a much better route, but a less accurate name).
I’d argue Adelaide’s is better because it is an actual place-to-place name, as opposed to Sydney’s which is just made up AFAIK. But I am very biased!
I’m a sucker for alliteration, what can I say.
But I guess that makes Bridge to Brisbane the perfect name. It’s alliterative and describes exactly what the race is (in its new and old-old form…the old-new route was a much better route, but a less accurate name).