xia@lemmy.sdf.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoForce is the last refuge of the incompetentlemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square25linkfedilinkarrow-up1433arrow-down13
arrow-up1430arrow-down1imageForce is the last refuge of the incompetentlemmy.sdf.orgxia@lemmy.sdf.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square25linkfedilink
minus-squareWoodScientist@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoThis CEO should be immediately canned for incompetence. Anyone who can’t understand the sunk cost fallacy has no business running any organization.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoYou think this is about RTO? He knows they’ll quit. That’s the point. You don’t pay severance to quitters. Anyone that’s truly critical to the company will somehow get an exception.
minus-squareBodilessGaze@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoBut the company has already invested so much into the CEO, they can’t just let him go because he doesn’t understand the sunk cost fallacy! /s
minus-squareČauky Mňauky@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI first read that as “caned.” One day…
minus-squareWoodScientist@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoOh, the CEO should also be caned…rectally.
This CEO should be immediately canned for incompetence. Anyone who can’t understand the sunk cost fallacy has no business running any organization.
You think this is about RTO? He knows they’ll quit. That’s the point. You don’t pay severance to quitters. Anyone that’s truly critical to the company will somehow get an exception.
But the company has already invested so much into the CEO, they can’t just let him go because he doesn’t understand the sunk cost fallacy! /s
I first read that as “caned.” One day…
Oh, the CEO should also be caned…rectally.