I love how search engines display inaccessible links.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    6 天前

    I read this as “we don’t want you, the user, to interact with our 100% user-content driven website that depends on your presence to keep having value”.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    7 天前

    When google started to index paywalled things… I thought that was pretty evil. Showing google content but not normal internet users. Giving sites the ability to have their cake and eat it too.

    When reddit decided to force logging in to see some subreddits on mobile, I decided they were evil.

    This is why I’m on Lemmy posting content, we have to use open platforms if we want them to succeed. This is the first time I’ve used social media. I’m doing it as a civic duty

    • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 天前

      When google started to index paywalled things…

      Google has (had?) a rule. If a site lets them index their paywalled content, then the site must deliver the full content if the referrer is google.com or else they will de-index the site. So when clicking a link on google, the full article should appear. It was an old trick to just google the article title to find a link and click through to read a paywalled article.

      Is that policy gone now?

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 天前

        as far as i can tell that policy never existed. The first instance of this was for academic articles being indexed behind a paywall, and they NEVER worked with the referrer being google.

        • hayes_@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 天前

          It kind of existed when Google included a link to every site’s cached content, but they removed that years ago.

            • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 天前

              I am surprised I didn’t even notice that, I used to use it for when sites changed or were down. I guess there’s always internet archive sites if I were so inclined, but still sad.

    • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 天前

      It’s hilarious that you made me curious enough to look up RDDT’s stock price today, down 9% today alone lol, -31% in the last 30 days. A third of their stock value lost in the past month, very impressive.

  • HappinessPill@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 天前

    I wish there was a way to filter all sites that block me like this, at least my search would actually show results I can read

    • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 天前

      Sometimes part of the content can be seen in the search result page, as the crawler got the content. But when you click inside, you’re blocked by the membership wall. Irony?

  • OpenStars@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 天前

    It did not used to be this way. Every website result used to be “cached”, but not anymore…

    Enshittification 😔

    • some_random_nick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 天前

      I wouldn’t expand it any further, as it already covers most of the important stuff. Far more people have to deal with Google’s bs than use R*ddit.

      • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 天前

        Fair enough. Sometimes it can make a difference though (speaking someone’s specific platform language). But yeah, I get it.

    • hansolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 天前

      You should get a better VPN. Mine only gives me this rarely, often when I’m using a node that I can assume is where a bunch of prime would use to run bots.

      • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 天前

        I like Mullvad. Probably the only reason I get the error is there’s one country that’s a fav, but some sites don’t like it because of its privacy restrictions … which ofc is why it’s my fav.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 天前

    file a ticket.

    You have been permanatley banned from Reddit. if you feel this was a mistake, please use the appeal process

    • nodiratime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 天前

      Yeah, I questioned the second and third temp bans they gave me. After the last (so, the third) they banned me. I suspect it’s because I was asking.

      Their reasons of course were bullshit, for every single ban (which they confirmed were correctly issued… Morons).

    • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 天前

      I’m on my 5th permban now I think. Some of them were because I logged in with an alt on the same IP by mistake so they flagged it and banned those too. I didn’t violate any ToS, they just didn’t agree because (I asked ChatGPT to summarize the behavior of reddit mods/admins):

      Woke Authoritarianism

      This refers to the enforcement of progressive or “woke” ideology through authoritarian means, such as:

      • Censorship of dissenting views
      • Cancel culture (public shaming and professional consequences for opposing opinions)
      • De-platforming (banning people from social media or public forums)
      • Forced ideological conformity (e.g., requiring adherence to specific beliefs in workplaces or academia)

      Thought Policing

      This term comes from George Orwell’s 1984 and refers to the control and regulation of people’s thoughts, often through fear, social pressure, or punishment for wrongthink. In the modern context, it can include:

      • Policing language to ensure ideological purity
      • Monitoring people’s statements (even from the past) to punish deviation
      • Enforcing conformity through intimidation, cancelation, or ostracization

      And a followup response:

      Authoritarian Leftism – When left-wing ideology is enforced through censorship, suppression of dissent, and ideological purity tests.

      Neoprogressivism / Woke Authoritarianism – Some critics use these terms to describe far-left movements that use de-platforming, cancel culture, and corporate-enforced speech restrictions to control discourse.

      Cultural Marxism (controversial term) – Some argue that elements of Marxist thought, particularly in cultural institutions, are used to enforce ideological dominance. However, this term is often misused or overgeneralized.

      Techno-Authoritarianism – When social media platforms and tech companies enforce ideological conformity through bans, shadowbanning, and algorithmic control.

      Soft Totalitarianism (coined by Rod Dreher) – Unlike classic totalitarianism (which uses force and violence), this is a modern, decentralized form of control through social shaming, cancel culture, and corporate censorship.

      ChatGPT seems to have hit the nail on the head, I didn’t even know “Woke Authoritarianism” was an actual term.

        • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 天前

          I gave it a list of actions and behaviors by admins/mods on reddit, and asked it what the political ideologies would be considered. That’s what ChatGPT spat out. I was curious how its inference would work given a list of behaviors. Hilarious being downvoted for pasting from ChatGPT’s inferences though, I’m just the messenger.

            • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 天前

              It only summarized the behaviors of the mods/admins, not the reddit userbase at large. There’s probably Venn diagram between the two but not exactly 100% the same. And things like shadowbanning (listed in the response) are not actions of the users, or political ideologies of the users either, only something a mod can do.

  • TheCreativeName@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 天前

    Just putting this out there, if you use startpage you can use the anonymous view feature to get around this :) Obviously avoiding reddit is better but if it’s the only available resource…

  • FourWaveforms@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 天前

    At least they told you you’re blocked, instead of just making random parts of it not work with zero communication