They used the “View Source” feature like I told them to.

You can see the real comment in the background.

You need to put a space after the period after your numbers to make a numbered list. Your list is all jumbled up into a paragraph. Doing it the right way also means the numbers you use don’t actually matter, which is nice because inserting an item near the top doesn’t mean you then have to edit all the numbers under it. They can all be 1. and the list will be numbered correctly.

My list:

1. Mull (Firefox fork)
2. Signal
3. Google Messages
4. Pi Music Player
5. Shattered Pixel Dungeon
6. Thunder for Lemmy
7. YouTube
8. Google Camera
9. Fossify Gallery
10. KeePassDX

For giggles, view the source of my comment. Oh shit, I broke it by adding a 10th item. At least in Thunder. It doesn’t support 1000000000 as a number for an ordered list.

slingshotted

The proper term is slingshat.

But their username has “Lemmy” in it. It’s a Lemmy post

Where #do you #think you #are?

Not sermon. “Semon”. It’s Jamaican cum.

They set the bread next to a candle for 30 seconds.

I guess. Not really.

“Peak Design has not provided customer information to the police and would only do so under the order of a subpoena"

That’s not the same as saying “We are against our employees calling the police when they see a suspect in our store.” after an employee does that. That’s what I’m talking about.

On the other hand, very few corporations would volunteer data without a court order. That’s normal. We’re not talking about that. We’re talking about coming out and saying, “We don’t support our employees calling the police on a suspect.” That’s something very few—or no—corporations would do.

It’s two very different statements and situations.

So, I guess boycott every corporation. 🤷🏼‍♂️

Like, not even your favorite non-profit would say that. You’re literally expecting the impossible.

Riiight. 'Cause that’s something any corporation would say, ever.

And say what?

I love how people are blaming McDonald’s—and boycotting them—for the actions of a single employee. How does that make any sense?

I read that as “Sleeping in the Cold Brew”.

both the arrest and conviction of the suspect

Makes perfect sense, but that’s just a matter of time.

might not be eligible for [the NYPD] part of the reward.

OK, so maybe they won’t be getting 10k of the 60k. They would still get 50k if he’s convicted. So many people are definitively saying that they’re getting none of the money, and that makes no sense.

I was thinking the same thing. So why is everyone on Lemmy saying “The snitch didn’t even get the money, so they did it for nothing!”

Anyone have a citation about the rat not getting the money? People keep saying that, but I haven’t seen a single article posted about it.

¡Exactamente!

$100$

Use them like quotes to cover all your bases.

Just use AI to fake it. I’m sure they won’t be able to tell the difference.

Use ChatGPT to help you write e-books, educational guides, or niche-specific content.

Yes, like how to forage for mushrooms so you can kill your readers with your bad information made up from ChatGPT bullshit.