• zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      18 天前

      The cookie law isn’t dumb, but at this point it should maybe be reformed. Basically as long as a website doesn’t do shady shit with cookies no cookie banner is required. Instead of complaining about the cookie banner law, people should complain about websites who sell their users’ data.

      • denshi@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        17 天前

        Basically as long as a website doesn’t do shady shit with cookies no cookie banner is required.

        That is actually the status quo. If a website only uses cookies that are needed to make the website function, there is no need for a banner or dialogue. These cookie banners are there deliberately to be annoying so you’ll agree to more than is necessary.

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 天前

        The newest take on cookies, is “accept all, or pay to read”. Quite shady, if you ask me.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 天前

        The dumb bit of the law is the fact that websites are allowed to put up an annoying banner that says either accept cookies or individually deselect 240 checkboxes.