The Los Angeles Times launched a new artificial intelligence-driven “evolution” to its company this week, with billionaire owner Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong writing in a letter to readers that the newspaper is “beginning a new effort” to offer multiple perspectives on its opinion columns. The AI feature, known as Insights, will not only summarize data and viewpoints from a written column, but also offer online readers real-time counterpoints to that same story at the bottom of the page.

What’s more, the Insights feature will provide readers with an AI assessment of the article’s “viewpoint” — that is, whether or not the writing adheres to a right-leaning, left-leaning or centrist point of view. Insights was developed by the Los Angeles Times in collaboration with AI news summary app Particle and San Francisco-based Perplexity AI.


In just one day of activity, the Insights feature has already run into trouble. Per New York Times tech reporter Ryan Mac, an AI summary of a Feb. 25 article by columnist Gustavo Arellano offered, under its “Different views on the topic” section, a softened perspective on one of America’s longest-running and most notorious white supremacist groups, the Ku Klux Klan, and its long history in Southern California.

Arellano’s article focused on the KKK’s place in Anaheim city politics a century ago. The AI-generated alternate viewpoint downplayed the KKK’s history there, saying that “local historical accounts occasionally frame the 1920s Klan as a product of ‘white Protestant culture’ responding to societal changes rather than an explicitly hate-driven movement.” A screenshot of the summary, taken by Mac, also noted that “critics argue that focusing on past Klan influence distracts from Anaheim’s modern identity as a diverse city.”

  • brvslvrnst@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    32 minutes ago

    Storytime!

    I was taking a mental health day not too long ago and went to a local diner. My thought was I should try interacting outside my bubble to make me feel better. And it kinda worked…ish. I should’ve read the flags, one of which was him saying my paper was fake news, but alas.

    Started talking to this old dude, apparently had a long historical knowledge of his family, which he stated family history placed their start in the 1700s. Talked about how his family took place in all the wars.

    After an insane detour on how the North actually was at fault for the first shots fired, he pivoted to how Sherman burned down the family plantation. How absolutely terrible that was for his family.

    Then he pivoted to talking about the KKK, and whewwww did that illuminate the absolute dichotomy of history for me. He stated that “they originally formed to protect women that were beat by their husbands.” After I asked about the whole racism bit, he said it wasn’t as bad as people made out.

    At that point I grabbed my check and peaced out. Totally helped me get over my funk by showing just how fucking insane people’s idea of history is.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      You have to remember a lot of people are colossally stupid, but still are in positions to make decisions.