TehBamski@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 天前What scientific fact blows your mind the most?message-squaremessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up157arrow-down11
arrow-up156arrow-down1message-squareWhat scientific fact blows your mind the most?TehBamski@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 天前message-square68fedilink
minus-squaresga@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 小时前a fun fact: for the most efficient mass energy conversion, you need a huge spin black hole (preferably naked). Then you can get about 42% conversion. (there was a minute physics video about it i think)
minus-squareabsGeekNZ@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 小时前No where near perfect mass conversion… Max theoretical mass-energy conversion efficiency is under 1%
minus-squareI Cast Fist@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·6 小时前Just a fancier way to spin turbines with steam
minus-squaredependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 小时前Fancier or more efficient?
What do you think fusion research is?
a fun fact: for the most efficient mass energy conversion, you need a huge spin black hole (preferably naked). Then you can get about 42% conversion. (there was a minute physics video about it i think)
15 years away from a useful result
No where near perfect mass conversion…
Max theoretical mass-energy conversion efficiency is under 1%
Just a fancier way to spin turbines with steam
Fancier or more efficient?
Existing nuclear energy, too.