Influencers are petite bourgeois. They work their own operation for profit, like a restaurant owner. The bourgeois are those who simply own assets and don’t have to work them to still take a profit.
why are we still letting some french assholes from 300 years ago define our socioeconomic vernacular?
what’s the point of all these new words, rizz and fleek and bussin etc if we’re still using a bunch of faux-faux bullshit rhetoric from a bunch of pompous ass wig fetishists?
Do you have a different term that indicates the same thing?
Financially independent? Why use all the extra syllables? What word do you use to refer to the class of people who can coast indefinitely on their existing wealth?
Influencers are petite bourgeois. They work their own operation for profit, like a restaurant owner. The bourgeois are those who simply own assets and don’t have to work them to still take a profit.
why are we still letting some french assholes from 300 years ago define our socioeconomic vernacular?
what’s the point of all these new words, rizz and fleek and bussin etc if we’re still using a bunch of faux-faux bullshit rhetoric from a bunch of pompous ass wig fetishists?
Do you have a different term that indicates the same thing?
Financially independent? Why use all the extra syllables? What word do you use to refer to the class of people who can coast indefinitely on their existing wealth?
shitbags.
Not a useful or precise term. Play again when you’ve got a real criticism please.
how about you get fucked, and I still call 'em shitbags.
yeah we’re going with that.