• EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      This is a neat idea until you’re in a situation where you remember 38 different words for a thing, just not the one in the language you need

      • ccunning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I only speak one language fluently and one language extremely poorly.

        The number of times I’ve been able to come up with the word I want in my second language and completely blanked on it in my native language baffles my mind.

        • DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          16 hours ago

          This is why I learned the shit out of English: If I forget a word, there’s like 6 more words that are close enough to the one I forgot.

    • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 hours ago

      If I could ‘cheat’ and say ‘I know every language in the world’, and that included programming languages and things like scientific notation as a language, I’d take that in a heartbeat. If not, I’d take programming, as at least then I can create things and make money.

      If speaking every language included dead and forgotten languages too though, then it would be a very tough choice.

      • shrodes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        This is probably super pedantic (bloody programmers right?) but I really feel like it would depend on what is meant by “know every programming language”. Like being able to remember every syntax and construct is sort of useful but not all that practical. Understanding how to implement the language in a useful way is the valuable part, not just knowing the keywords.

        I guess I would kind of compare it to the difference between being able to read Shakespeare and being able to write Shakespeare,

        • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Correct. Learning a programming language is trivial. Far easier than a foreign language.

          If we think of it in terms of learning a language, what matters is the grammar and ability to use it to struct prose to create a coherent story.

          There’s also a lot of reuse which requires knowing what’s available. The closest analogy there is how music sampling is used.

    • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’d make tens of dollars as the scholar to decode the Harrapan/Indus Valley script!

      Or I make makes millions as a YouTuber decoding the Voynich manuscript…

      Our society is broken:(

    • niktemadur@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      If it was just one language and writing system as a choice, I might say Japanese.

      There are so many different characters in their writing as symbols instead of phonetic sounds, that bookstores in Japan are divided into sections, in which one has books that use… say 500 characters, then another section with books that use 1200 characters, or 5000, or 10,000, or more!
      To read Japanese or Chinese with a mastery of over 10,000 symbols might be my choice. The richness and depth of those writings must be something incredible.

      My second choice, for shits ‘n’ giggles, might be something like Sumerian or Akkadian, in the original Cuneiform!

    • adam_y@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I can’t even imagine how powerful I would be if I could be ignored in every language.