• Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Statistically speaking: if 17% of people say that the murder of the healthcare CEO is even somewhat acceptable, if you were to pick 12 people randomly from that group (so not accounting for any other potential filters from a jury questionnaire), you’d only have a 10% chance that all 12 answering it is unacceptable.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      That’s not how jury selection works, though. They find people, filter some out, bring in the alternates, filter them out, and repeat until they have 12 they’re happy with.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        They will try, but people will answer that murder is not acceptable and then find not guilty later anyway. And they can potentially do that truthfully. If they find small issues with the evidence, they can go with not guilty.

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        You are correct. That’s why I said specifically not accounting for filtering from the jury selection questionnaire, when extrapolating the ABC poll to statistics for a hypothetical 12-person jury. Of course the actual jury is not selected once and entirely randomly, but I was hoping to provide an interesting statistic.