I used i3 for years on Ubuntu then discovered Regolith Desktop and haven’t gone back. The thing is, I’ve never encountered anyone else who uses it.

  • sping@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    I like to use i3 in a desktop environment so I don’t have to reinvent the wheel of sundry support details like hotkeys and monitor behavior, automounting USB drives.

    I’ve used gnome flashback with i3, just like regolith, and decided to try using regolith to get the full curated environment but I found their obfuscation of what’s going on impossible to deal with. Just working out how to change configuration was a huge pain in the ass and had to be done the regolith way.

    But every new OS release with a new version of flashback etc. doesn’t seem to work right, so I am contemplating giving up and just going direct window manager and accumulating all those sundry details of a DE manually.

        • sping@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          Gnome-flashback by default is an old-school Gnome DE (Desktop Environment) that comes with a simple, conventional WM but allows you to swap in any WM you like while it operates in the background. Mainstream Gnome Shell DE is inextricably tied to its WM so you can’t swap into that. So with Gnome-flashback you can swap in i3 and get a curated Gnome DE with your own (i3) WM.

          It means you don’t have to reinvent everything that makes a DE just to use i3 WM. You get things like the Gnome settings GUI including monitor configuration and restoration on hotplug; clipboard manager; theming; audio/brightness hotkeys just work; USB drives automount, and more. Lots of convenience and utility you want and need but otherwise have to identify, install, configure and set up manually. Without using an already curated DE you have to reinvent one, or at least reinvent the parts of one you can’t live without.

          Gnome-flashback is not the only DE that allows swapping in a different WM. My own experience has found it a bit of a PITA every time I try to use it on an OS with an updated Gnome version, requiring poking around, searching and debugging. Sadly, there seem to be limited options for low effort, well polished, curated i3/sway DE.

          • flashgnash@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            25 days ago

            Ahhh right gotcha

            For all intensive purposes is that not very similar to just installing all the gnome tools on i3 though?

            • sping@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              24 days ago

              Yes of course that’s exactly what it is. A DE is just a collection of daemons and tools. None of it’s rocket science but a lot of it is unclear unless you dig in deeper. And it’s work that someone has already done.

              (BTW… Intents and purposes)

          • flashgnash@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            25 days ago

            It doesn’t really, I mean on a technical level, like is it a fork of gnome with a tiling wm hacked in, a tiling wm with gnome bits hacked in or a completely different thing inspired by gnome

  • lancalot@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    26 days ago

    I love both GNOME and automatic/dynamic tiling. So Regolith should have been a match made in heaven. However, unfortunately:

    • It’s not found in the repositories of any major distro. You know it’s messed up if it’s not packaged as a nixpkg!
    • If you can look surpass that, it’s still intended only on Debian/Ubuntu. While the AUR package exists (and even RebornOS -an Arch-derivative- offers it in their own repos), you’re simply out of luck outside of that. So, as a Fedora enjoyer myself, this unfortunately applies to me as well.
  • Yaky@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    25 days ago

    Tried it out a while ago, and found that I prefer GNOME’s UX and configurable shortcuts better, and that two side-by-side applications on my laptop is the most “tiles” I would realistically want.

  • arbitrary_sarcasm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    26 days ago

    I had it recommended to me by a colleague. And I’ve gotta say, it’s fantastic.

    Some nitpicks (when it comes to curved screens) , but otherwise it’s pretty much flawless.