The Unreal series may have been shelved years ago, but Epic is letting its first two installments live on through the Internet Archive.

The Unreal series may have been shelved years ago, but Epic is letting its first two installments live on through the Internet Archive.

  • Quazatron@lemmy.worldEnglish
    321·
    1 month ago

    Excellent that they don’t engage in Nintendo level community hostility and at least let people who care about old games preserve them.

    Stream goes one step further and actively maintains their legacy games playable. That is commitment.

    • Final Remix@lemmy.worldEnglish
      23·
      1 month ago

      Gog goes another step and provides a guarantee on stuff they’ve modified to ensure it works, and provide an offline installer that’s entirely self-contained for archviing purposes.

      • Quazatron@lemmy.worldEnglish
        8·
        1 month ago

        I prefer to buy GOG when possible, Steam second. I even have some duplicated titles across vendors.

    • DacoTaco@lemmy.worldEnglish
      4·
      1 month ago

      Eh, i wouldnt say they are better. They explicitly pulled all unreal games off all stores ( steam, epic store, gog, … ), killed all servers and when asked acted like unreal never existed. They are pieces of shit for doing it and they had no real reason in doing so imo…

  • stardust@lemmy.caEnglish
    17·
    1 month ago

    Winning move from Epic. Showing what should be done for abandoned games. Give it back to the people so it can continued to be enjoyed by the community that will continue to care for it.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.ukEnglish
      8·
      1 month ago

      There’s literally no reason not to do that. The game has long since made money and keeping it out of public ownership is now not doing anyone any favors.

      Some studios are just intransigent.

  • Glide@lemmy.caEnglish
    163·
    1 month ago

    While I don’t approve of Epic’s stabs at exclusivity, Steam needs a competitor to keep it in check, and one that is making some efforts to support the preservation of art is a welcome choice.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.ukEnglish
        36·
        1 month ago

        As much as I like them I don’t think you can call them a competitor.

        I’ve seen games that are available on both platforms that sell hundreds of times more copies on Steam simply because of steam’s reputation.

        A competitor actually has to be able to compete.

          • Glide@lemmy.caEnglish
            12·
            1 month ago

            My experience with GOG is that it is a fringe option, at least in the combined North American (USA+Canada) culture. Plus, the unfortunate reality is that in many cases GOG’s principles preclude it from being a genuine competitor to Steam. Insisting on being DRM free means half of released games never go to the platform, so it will always be the secondary “better if” option.

            I worry about Steam’s functional monopoly on PC game access. It hasn’t been an issue so far, because it has remembered that it is, first and foremost, a service, providing consumer protection through a generous refund policy and supporting devs with easy access to simple matchmaking and anti-cheat systems. But without a healthy competitor, it would be easy for Steam to start milking it’s users and developers alike.

  • Zer0_F0x@lemmy.worldEnglish
    6·
    1 month ago

    Oh man, UT2004 was my fave arena death match back in the day, so much fun. Hope they release more!