jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 2 months agoTrump Defies the #MeToo Movement With Cabinet Picks Facing Accusationswww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1254arrow-down111
arrow-up1243arrow-down1external-linkTrump Defies the #MeToo Movement With Cabinet Picks Facing Accusationswww.nytimes.comjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-square_bcron_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35arrow-down4·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareimPastaSyndrome@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 months agoOh please “saner” people than dr fuckin oz are a possibility
minus-square_bcron_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarekent_eh@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoSaner than Oz and willing to work with Trump? I find that hard to believe.
minus-squarePriorityMotif@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoThey’re obviously being picked for their deviceveness. Not really sure what the endgame is other than to spread fear, anger, and uncertainty. Some strategists is coming up with these picks for some reason.
minus-squareTiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·edit-22 months agoIt’s a way for him to test people’s loyalty. Anyone who doesn’t vote to confirm his insane picks is going to be ousted by the rest of the party.
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months ago deviceveness Deviousness? It’s what autocorrect suggested the moment I started typing the word.
minus-squareObsidianNebula@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoBased on the context, I think they meant “divisiveness”, but “deviousness” probably also describes the nominations well.
minus-squarePriorityMotif@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoI I misspelled it, it should have been divisiveness, “a tendency to provoke dissension or discord” deviousness, “The characteristic of being devious; sneakiness; underhandedness.”
deleted by creator
Oh please “saner” people than dr fuckin oz are a possibility
deleted by creator
Saner than Oz and willing to work with Trump?
I find that hard to believe.
They’re obviously being picked for their deviceveness. Not really sure what the endgame is other than to spread fear, anger, and uncertainty. Some strategists is coming up with these picks for some reason.
It’s a way for him to test people’s loyalty. Anyone who doesn’t vote to confirm his insane picks is going to be ousted by the rest of the party.
Deviousness? It’s what autocorrect suggested the moment I started typing the word.
Based on the context, I think they meant “divisiveness”, but “deviousness” probably also describes the nominations well.
I I misspelled it, it should have been divisiveness, “a tendency to provoke dissension or discord”
deviousness, “The characteristic of being devious; sneakiness; underhandedness.”