Silverchase@sh.itjust.works to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agoProof by fucking obviousnesssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1382arrow-down114
arrow-up1368arrow-down1imageProof by fucking obviousnesssh.itjust.worksSilverchase@sh.itjust.works to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-squarepseudo@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months ago Then again, I thought 1+1=2 is axiomatic (2 being the defined by having a count of one and then another one) So I don’t understand why Bertrand Russel had to spend 86 pages proving it from baser fundamentals. It is mathematic. Of course it has to be proved.
It is mathematic. Of course it has to be proved.