I think axiom should fit, but according to its official definition, an axiom is a statement that is taken to be true, and as far as I know, a word can’t make an statement by its own.

  • Barky@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Axiomatic is pretty good. Irreducible is another. However, I would argue there are no undescribable words. If that were true, no one could learn certain words in other languages

    • Zozano@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I wonder if anyone has ever said something was indescribable, it was just because they weren’t aware of the word needed to describe it.

      Even in a way, saying something was indescribable is doing a lot of heavy lifting by itself, which is weird.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There are many, MANY words that do not have a 1 to 1 relationship between languages. Love is actually one of the more basic concepts most all languages have a word for.

        The areas languages gets really interesting are in the idioms. THOSE are the expressions that generally take many words to explain.

        Which is why if you want to write easily translatable text, never use idioms.

        • CobblerScholar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          German is a great example of having words that mean a whole phrase in English, Schadenfreude (humor at someone’s expense) for one

  • Sertou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fundamental is the term used to describe concepts like points in geometry. This seems like an analogous case, so I suggest it for your use here.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The definition of crack in that instance would be something along the lines of: “The snapping sound the air makes when creating a small sonic boom. Like that of a whip cutting through the air.”

      Even onomatopoeia has synonyms. Like some people say Atchoo. Some say kerchew. And then other languages say other words for the same sound.

  • kozel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe not exactly what you’re looking for, but you could be interested in “circular definition”.

  • meco03211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That shouldn’t be the case. Where that breaks down in more formal contexts is circular definitions. You don’t want to define one word using others that simply reference the defined word in their own definition. All words can be defined using the other available words. At some point it would become circular, but that’s of no consequence in the scope of all words.

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    All words all symbolic of their referents, but the symbolism is usually arbitrary. So I don’t think there are actually any words like that.