The censored one is probably Niger

UPDATE - special thanks to @dditty@lemm.ee for making a map showing the countries without access to PSN:

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Wasn’t Valve the one who pointed out that Russia was always pirating games not because they were inherently pirates but because the game releases had zero support for Russia lol. Hence why Valve was the first foreign developer/publisher that gained an actual foothold in the Russian market.

    This is kind of like the same thing. Sony will just say something dumb like “we don’t allow PSN accounts in these countries because they’re full of pirates”.

    • snowadv@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The second problem is absence of regional prices in other markets but Steam.

      They are selling games two (!!) or so times cheaper in RU region. For example, AAA game might cost 60 dollars or 6000 rub in US but it will costs 35 or 3500 rub in russian steam.

      Even though I couldn’t afford games in the past and pirated them - at some point I started buying stuff just because it gives much better, hustle -free experience.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        If I’m low on cash, I pirate. When I have cash, I buy up the games I want. If it’s a game I enjoyed years ago and it’s on sale, I grab it.

        The idea that piracy results in lost sales is flawed. No one I know who pirates can purchase the game to begin with.

        Is a library piracy? No? Cool, discussion over.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          I mean… Saying that it doesn’t result in lost sales at all is disingenuous.

          They aren’t losing 70 dollars for every download, but they also aren’t losing zero.

        • localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I often took the same approach back when buying a game was a financial consideration. But even though now 4/5 times I already know hat I’m buying and just pay, there are still the 1/5 times I’ll pirate first as I’m really on the fence. Due to this I have a few games I ended up completing on pirate, but bought the game (and DLC if relevant) with 0 hours in my library because good work deserves recognition.

          Otherwise we risk losing those good developers to other careers or into the AAA meat grinder.

          For clarity I’m talking Indy titties here, I doubt I average much above 0.5/year AAA purchases anymore

          Edit: actually I’ll go one step further. If I pirate your game and hate it, then its delete and forget. If I buy your game and hate it that’s a potential negative review, maybe even though me and that title we just a bad fit. This is why demos need to become ubiquitous again