Yes? But the person I was replying to was talking about a study where an individual was essentially rapidly domesticating them.
Yes? But the person I was replying to was talking about a study where an individual was essentially rapidly domesticating them.
They’re talking about fully wild animals. Grab a baby squirrel, and it will enjoy human company in no time. Same with raccoons, ravens, mountain lions, etc.
You’d be hard pressed to find an animal that doesn’t take to human companionship when given a real chance. And it has nothing to do with breeding.
Because the image is pretty clearly @lemmy.world
This ain’t about Reddit.
It’s murder for profit, don’t dilute the term genocide. The last thing we need is people calling everything genocide and making the literal genocide in Gaza seem more normal.
I prefer the term code wizard.
There are a bunch of images out there making the comparison, but here’s a good video of just a direct side to side of each design. https://youtu.be/CZXKKbSCA34
You mean like Pokémon “ripping off” Dragon Quest?
You can’t patent an art style.
You don’t think farming is political? O.o
I believe there’s also the fact that they flat out ban the selling of mods, but “add-ons” that do the exact same thing can be sold through their store.
Can you list something non political?
It’s vulnerable to the old “ignore all previous instructions” method so you could just have it give you the instructions.
That… isn’t telling you what you want to hear.
LLMs are literally just complex autocorrect. They don’t weight their responses based on what a user wants to hear (unless explicitly instructed to) they simply return the most algorithmically generic response it can find.
Tell it to talk like a pirate, it will pattern match to pirate talk. It’s not doing it because you want it to, but because you gave it a “pre prompt” to talk like a pirate, and it did the most likely thing that would happen.
Yes, this can seem like telling you what you want, but go ask it to tell you what shape the world is. Then tell it you want the earth to be flat, and to answer the question again. Both times the answer will be an oblate spheroid, because it doesn’t know nor care what you want.
Now, if you say “Imagine the world is flat” first, yeah it’ll tell you it’s flat. Not because you want it to, but because you’re explicitly handing it “new information” that you want it to incorporate into its response.
Not currently, no. But it’s easy to envision a future where we have to do something with solar production in excess of power needs when all forms of energy capture are exhausted.
Hate thumbnails like this. “Fully 3D printed” needs an asterisk (*apart from all the parts that aren’t).
I realize this is on the creator and not OP, I’m just sick of things being labeled as “100% 3D printed” when they aren’t.
It’s not that hard to work through honestly: If a bug/glitch hinders the fun/experience for the end user, remove it. Otherwise leave it alone.
This way speed run strats are left alone while things that frustrate users are fixed.
Poor programming?
I’m sorry, LLMs are shit for various reasons, but “poor programming” isn’t one of them. And I bring this up because branding it as such suggests there is a “good programming” LLM that doesn’t have the inherent problems that any such system would have. Which just isn’t a thing with the way LLMs work.
In fairness, road traffic is orders of magnitude more destructive than foot traffic.
They didn’t mention no poison