Honestly, I was, indeed, refering to that one. I dind’t know anker was doing one, but it is the same generic that many brands are selling. It’s optical and not laser, therefore precision is mediocre and the battery doesn’t last too long like the laser ones. Also the construction materials feel pretty bad. I mean, it’s what could you expect from a cheap mouse. But again, the normal mouses have much better mouses and with laser sensors for similar prices.

Been uing them for a long time. But it is really hard to find a good one under 40/50€. Normal mouses have a lot of the goodones in 30€.

At the time I tried (2009), I was too young and afraid of messing up my Windows (I didn’t even know if I was able to remove Windows and not loose the warranty), so I was finally did thanks to the marvelous Wubi installer. It let you try Ubuntu without messing around with partitions. Thanks to that, I was able to start learning Linux until I gained confidence and did a proper dual boot.

Now I only use Arch, even for work.

Amen

Ubuntu Satanic Edition’s favourite kernel.

In what kind of world is a missing feature or a broken feautre due to incomplete migration to a new ecosystem, a reason to boycott that new ecosystem?? Those are simply not valid arguments to me.

They are obviously valid arguments to say, hey, this work is not completed, is not mature enough etc. So, therefore, you stay with previous ecosystem. But to boycott it because of that? That does not make sense to me at all.

I always wanted this mesh feature in mullvad. But how this works with privacy? I mean, does the combination with a user loged service like tailscale diminish the privacy of anonymous mullvad accounts?