wholookshere

And chevron deference is dead.

So its up to judges to determine what the rules are.

Say what you will about the clown courts the US has. But then don’t claim that HIPAA matters at all then. Because its only worth the paper it’s on sure. But then the entire conversation is moot.

There’s no legal definition of “yet to be defined” rules. That’s not how the US legal system works. You cant define rules after the fact and call someone guilt/in violation of rules that don’t exist.

Violation of what specifically?

Because HIPAA does not say you cant store data with third parties. That would be every cloud EMR out there.

That’s my point though. Is HIPAA says nothing technical about who can store data, just who’s responsible for it getting out.

I’m also required to be compliant.

But how can companies like google have products like

https://cloud.google.com/security/compliance/hipaa

if cloud storage is a violation?

I’m not op, and I’ve Read the actual law.

Fun fact, the law actually does not lay out a single technical “must do”.

But rather establish liabilities and defines miss use. Which is NOT the same as proper use.

Yes, but you talked about how cloud storage vs on prem is a violation.

Put up or shut up.

Also see my edit about a BAA

Legally, any organization that used this service would be opening themselves to further liability under HIPAA.

What legal violation? Because the law says nothing about that.

what the law does allow, is data storage with a BAA.

can you site the part of HIPAA that says that?

There’s no certification for HIPAA defined in law.

I’ve got repacked games to work just fine.

1. he’s using a tool that took billions in funding.

2. that’s not how open source licensing work.

3. no, I’m saying some licneses restrict LLM usage in the form of derivative work must also be licensed under the same license. Using that work as a starting point requires you to also open that portion of code.

side note:

https://www.securityweek.com/github-copilot-chat-flaw-leaked-data-from-private-repositories/

why does AI have access to private code?

That’s not what an LLM is doing is it.

Sure, but that’s just your view.

And also not how LLMs work.

They gobble up everything and cause unreadable code. Not learning.

The fuck you talking about.

Using a tool with billions of dollars behind it robinhood?

How is stealing open source prihcets code regardless of license stealing fr corporation’s?

the solution isn’t to lie down in defeat. its boycott.

LLMs have stolen works from more than just artists.

ALL of public repositories at a minimum have been used as training, regardless of licence. including licneses that require all dirivitive work be under the same license.

so there’s more than just lutris stollen.

so you draw the line at stealing artists work, but not programmers work?

citation needed

Ah yes, if anyone is against AI, because of its problems, then we’ve all lost our minds.

Ahh yes, how dare a community run and funded project have community accountability.

The project has several ways of being community funded.