I was about to agree with you but I reread it. Women is used as well, and the sentence that uses females is about their biology not choice.

Still not accepting the argument about the implication on men’s coding though.

Life as a Service

I technically agree with this. If it came down to making laws about this or that, body autonomy takes priority. But I don’t think that should preclude discussion about an individual’s motivation for the modification, and whether it is healthy.

I’m assuming it’s because of that one time the Proton CEO endorsed or appeared to endorse Trump. If it’s more than that I’m interested in the answer too.

Isn’t the rule of thumb that you can use it for things you can verify? They were able to verify.

Haha this is right in the middle of the spectrum between Comic Sans and Simpsons.

lol I had never seen that trailer but you are so right.

My Mac is supposed to be the safe box too. I keep having to talk myself down from installing Asahi.

Urge to distro hop again…rising…

I think this is a prudent approach and worth following through on, but plenty of intelligent people go bonkers outside of their domains.

Wait did you actually tip it and break it? That’s awesome I want to know this spite story is true.

I laughed so hard at this. Always love getting another take on the absurdity of treating the Bible as immutable knowledge.

I’m convinced of the dark forest hypothesis. Even 200 ly is too big for me.

It’s the tweet equivalent of comedic timing.

You pick it up by the twine and apply the ol’ hectoNewton metre.

Is this a righty tax since they are forced to buy a higher minimum quantity?

I have the problem that I give off a vibe as an onlooker. I’m not trying to be judgmental but I guess I ooze it.

Edit: Your case makes me chuckle. I used to love watching IT struggle because I got rid of default desktop and quick launch icons. Finally we have all learned to search.

I can’t even get past Donald’s statement which is absurd to me. What actually has “intrinsic value [in the] universe” and what difference does it make if my experiences are “intrinsically valuable” or not?

Can you help me understand the image? The turning lane here is foiled by more than two-ish cars, but that’s still better than the one car it would take to block the right turners otherwise.

Can you summarize the gist of it? I keep seeing this claim and it is extremely non-intuitive.

Supposing it’s true, how is it we’ve magically arrived at the optimal number of lanes as of the uttering of the statement?

If it’s a basically linear function where the lowest traffic is near-zero lanes, is there an implication that mass transit would be built in tandem with lane reduction, or does everyone just get more miserable?

Edit: I’ll add that what I’ve heard is that more people choose to drive until the misery-equilibrium is reached. So roads will always be as busy as they are now because they are at their max tolerable level of drivability. That seems plausible for some roads and for some finite number of lanes, but not generally applicable.