• 0 Posts
  • 104 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle






  • Here’s the problem though: the CEO will never have had his day in court, or have at least any reasonable punishment enforced upon them. He, and these other rich assholes, are effectively untouchable. Sure, you’ll hear a couple getting dragged into court for some reason or another, but will they ever have their lives ruined akin to what this shithead did to his clients? No, they pay for it to go away and then continue on like nothing happened.

    Exception: they will face consequences if whatever they do hurts someone richer than them, usually by ripping them off (see: Madoff, Bankman-Fried, etc).





  • the_tab_key@lemmy.worldtoMath Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneSimplify
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    It’s raw text on my side, looks fine. It might be fixed now? Not sure how the formatting works for equations on Lemmy.

    And correct, I don’t agree with whatever you are interpreting from your math textbooks because “simplify” literally means to make the equation easier to understand. You are arguing that “expand and simplify” is the exact same thing as “simplify”… Which if they were, it would just be in word, wouldn’t it… Sometimes factoring is prudent. Other times expansion is necessary. This is exemplified by the math I gave in the previous comment.

    And thanks for the downvotes. I hope you don’t treat your students the same way when they question your ultimate wisdom by dismissing them outright. I certainly don’t to mine.





  • the_tab_key@lemmy.worldtoMath Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneSimplify
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    My stipulation was that the x-x term didn’t exist, such that the equation would be fully simplified (assuming the request was “factor and simplify”). Yes, you could also “expand and simplify” (as in your other comment) but I would argue the result of that would be less simplified than the factored version. Eye of the beholder type thing.

    I agree that if x-x did exist as a term then expand and simplify would be correct (that is if x-x wasn’t noticed to be 0 immediately and no expansion would be needed at all).