Yeah right? Don’t tell us " um, hey. there’s a good reason prices will rise" when we have been watching prices rise just cuz they can.
The record profits they have been flaying us with could cover this additional cost, but the line must go up.
:D:D:D
K why did his beard move, i honestly don’t get that part
There’s a teensy bit of data massaging to make the approval rating appear lower… in my opinion of course.
The respondents were asked to rank “acceptability of the killers actions” on a scale of 1 to 5.
Assumin’the average “young voter” views gunning strangers down as:
[1.very unfavorable]
(You would, if asked about murder, say it was bad As a rule. right? I would too. Ya know, unless it was justified.)
Looking at it that way, the same data looks a lot different suddenly.
33% young voters still think the killer is completely unjustified.
7% think there was some justification
19% are undecided if the CEO deserved to die for what he did
24% think the killer was mostly justified… But have reservations
17% believe he was 100% in the right
I got a little free with the interpretations but you get the idea, You could decide to frame the data this way too. there’s a saying: statistics don’t lie but statisticians do. Here’s my 100% true alternate title using the data but presented with the story I want to tell:
Right. Thing is the ones in power never limit themselves to such kid-gloves in response.
We are literally nothing to them.
Yeah, good habits n such are important to cultivate until they’re second-nature.
Man i would love to read a transcription of that call hahaha!
"I walked into my private bathroom during the 15 minute “return to office pizza party and some animal had written DDD on the wall! I pay good money for this service, want a police escort for my coffee run!”
-Seeo the Clown
I hope being a CEO becomes the most dangerous job in the country making the job untenable until they all get replaced with wallstreetbets AI algo.
“No matter how angry we are, you cannot take a weapon, a ghost gun, put a silencer on and target someone and shoot them. That’s the bottom line,” said Adams
Actually big guy? Turns out you can
Er my bad i was referencin the post being a joke, not your reply being one. That was poorly phrased on my part
I know it’s the post is just a joke, but yeah money sadly is serious biz and beef between friends if things don’t feel fair. It sucks but i chalk it up to the hellscape we live in.
Everyone has their money tics. A long time pal gets pissed if i pull the “whisper the waiter” trick and pay the whole dinner bill for example. For my part, I feel weird about owing people, like they’ll hate me if i cant pay my way.
I get the feeling this might just make the gamblers gain a new fetish
Right i was just clarifying what i learned about PEGIs setup, that it seems similar to the US’s ESRB. I’m a yank and didn’t know before looking either
I can’t see any news that you can ‘pay to remove ads’ but lots of “how do i remove ads in solitaire” with settings instructions or registry edits so i think op is only half right
i got curious and looks like PEGI is somewhat similar at least. The ISFE is a self-regulating/co-regulating (w/e that means) body. There seem to be some kinda independent audits but… Looks like they don’t audit so good, if this article is evidence
Haha! They can’t leave, silly, they have hate to spread!
If i can find the article all about bullshit the Democrats’ did to the ACA before it got signed I’ll link it. Quite a bit more to it then compromising with Rs, they had a lot of Ds to ‘convince’
Ah yes thanks for that you’re right
5 to 13 percent isn’t a big deal really. I bet it’s not even due to what article implies. investors don’t care about public perception, they’re worried that UHC changed course on a lucrative planned policy (restricting anaesthesia) and might do so again impacting profits.
Dems killed off single-payer years ago. Obamacare was designed to be dogshit under their watch. Sorry friend, we both are in the sufferin’-timeline where the DNC never does anything but crush any chance at progressive policy that could “hurt” their rich donors
A 299-page report in Science advocates banning such research until safety can be ensured and calls for global debate on its ethical and ecological implications
Which will not be read or followed!
Weeeeee! Maybe i die of superflu instead of hunger or jackboot
I kinna stayed away from that sub cuz of precisely that reason but I’m always down for a good yarn now i wanna see if i can dig that one up
Eddie: found it! It’s a multi parter, I’m excited, thanks https://redlib.nohost.network/r/nosleep/comments/7asz8x/has_anyone_heard_of_the_leftright_game_part_1/
You mind telling me your favorite so i can listen?