Thanks! I love hearing new music.

Thank you, this is exactly how I feel about it and nails the point. I never understood how a country can call itself “the greatest” while allowing people to literally starve and die in the streets. It’s shameful.

There is SO much evidence that giving homes and/or money to homeless people works. This is literally just a couple of examples, but there are tons of articles and research on it.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/09/americas/direct-giving-homeless-people-vancouver-trnd/index.html

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/homeless-housing-first_n_6956962

It comes down to a CHOICE. We, as a society choose to let people suffer because capitalism requires winners and losers. It requires the working class be terrified of losing its grip and be willing to give up negotiating for better pay or working conditions. This means: letting poor and homeless suffer.

Look at what happened during lock down. When workers who could work from home were able to, there was a mass shift in life and priorities. Suddenly “your work is your life” rang extra hollow.

All these businesses pushing “return to office” are doing so because allowing workers to realize their power and push for change doesn’t benefit their real estate portfolio. The wealthy are terrified of losing their grip.

The worst part is: the method that’s employed is capitalist propaganda, and it’s carried out by your parents, grandparents, family, friends, etc. The whole idea of allowing a small number of people to accumulate staggeringly massive sums “because they earned it” is so contrary to social animal nature that it has to be embedded into your brain, like religion from a young age.

We’re so thoroughly screwed, that it’s the best I can do to get through the day without having a massive panic attack about it.

I try not to talk about it in real life because everyone is so in denial or like me, can’t deal with the fact that we’re still pretending “this is fine” while the house is on fire.

It was created to protect individual artists commercial rights. But at this point, it’s rent-seeking. Corporations who own copyrighted works long after the death of an artist/writer/musician and the sale of the asset by the heirs benefits nobody but the mega-corps who have the power to brutally enforce them.

Society does not benefit by this.

Surely there has to be a better way to encourage and reward creative people. In truth, how many truly prosper by their works? A handful. It’s much more common to create something in service of a corporation, who then immediately owns the rights to it.