• 0 Posts
  • 379 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle

  • I used xmpp with otr encryption… maybe also omemo, it rings a bell. This was some years ago. But it was barely usable. Otr refused to connect at times and only unecrypted worked, messages were encrypted with wrong keys or something and history became unreadable. It worked on the desktop, but then not on the phone, only with this and that client, but not those. It was a confusing mess and I had to stop using it. If it works today, thats great.













  • Really? Swedish government:

    [G]rants may be paid in the amount of SEK 350,000 for those who have reached the age of 18 and SEK 25,000 for those who have not reached the age of 18, but not more than SEK 500,000 for spouses or cohabitants and not more than SEK 600,000 per family

    https://www.regeringen.se/pressmeddelanden/2025/04/ett-kraftigt-hojt-atervandringsbidrag/

    So that is a litte less that 35,000 USD (after this proposed increase). This is liberal politics in Sweden.

    Also to note, the first statement from the minister there in that link, Johan Forssell, his son is active club neonazi. He is still in the party and a Swedish minister. That, and how his party is collaborating with a full party of “ex” neonazis, is how far separated our governments are from nazis in Europe.




  • Val: whale Val: choice Val: election

    Smell: lukt Impact: smäll [sounds almost like ‘smell’] Speed: fart

    The speed worsens the impact: the fart worsens the smäll

    I ~ sounds like Swedish word for ‘ouchie’, Aj. Buy ~ almost sounds like Baj(s) = poop Pink ~ to “pinka” is to pee, “pink” may be just urine Sheet ~ almsot sounds like “skit” = shit (with an accent)

    Ouchie poop piss shit = I buy pink sheet

    Kiss = Puss Wee = kiss (+piss/pink)

    Wanna kiss?




  • mumblerfish@lemmy.worldtoaww@lemmy.worldWe all need that
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Are you saying this just because you are angry, or your actual rational conclusion? Because my claim was that the infograph used a bullshit source, and I doubted the figure due to it. Then you provided another source from another org, AVMA, stating a different number, proving that the graph was bull. Not only that, that source organisation, AVMA, was also the same that I used to claim that “Dog bite org” looked shady.

    What claim do you want me to source? That “dog bite org” appears to be bull? That is basically the only attempt at a claim I have made. Well, AVMA is my source then. You linked them. Read them.