every large organization is inefficient, anyone who has worked at a huge company knows this. This is just another capitalist myth that happens to keep economic control in private hands where the wealthy get more votes than the poor, as opposed to public hands where (in theory) votes are equal.
she’s gonna be so relieved
Hey if enough Americans are motivated he may not have to serve the full sentence. If this were the start of something bigger he could easily get out sooner.
If everyone goes back to complacency though you’re definitely right.
Trigger happy mods should know that I’m advocating for political and cultural change but not specifying that it must be through violence.
why are there so many delusional Democrats?
It’s ok to admit both parties suck. Yes to different degrees, but you don’t have to gaslight yourself into thinking Democrats care about you
let’s also give some blame to the DNC for pushing that dud on everyone
deleted by creator
yes and no, ray tracing still requires decisions about fidelity, the same poor decisions can be made in either rendering system
I also really enjoyed them (and the legacy of kain series) and would love to see a resurgence, but I’m skeptical about the quality of the remaster. Hoping to be pleasantly surprised by reviews and gameplay footage
How’s capitalism working out for ya
lol… imagine capitalism without police
oh ok since you said it twice I guess many examples of successful communes are wrong
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/peter-gelderloos-anarchy-works
And this right here is fascist ideology
Why celebrate them doing it for selfish reasons? Biden is finally willing to break norms but not to do anything that’ll actually benefit the country.
Your arguments would make sense if he tried to pack the supreme court or take extra measures to prevent project 2025 but he’s just protecting his guilty son… Yay?
This is simple tribalism at best.
It’s easy to say this but why are you buying a video game instead of buying someone food? Why are you driving an expensive car?
Yes there are problems in the world that “can be solved by money” but picking and choosing which transactions are wrong isn’t the way to go about it.
Our economic system doesn’t allocate resources according to need, that’s not the fault of these two individuals. Direct your energy toward changing the system.
A person’s relationship with their life is an interesting thing philosophically. You can’t consent to it, and most of us feel you can’t easily give it up either.
I don’t believe this myself but you could rationally argue that having life and being required to keep living is a violation of your agency as a human being.
I still had this in my clipboard from an earlier comment:
"The son of the worker, on entering life, finds no field which he may till, no machine which he may tend, no mine in which he may dig, without accepting to leave a great part of what he will produce to a master. He must sell his labour for a scant and uncertain wage. His father and his grandfather have toiled to drain this field, to build this mill, to perfect this machine. They gave to the work the full measure of their strength, and what more could they give? But their heir comes into the world poorer than the lowest savage. If he obtains leave to till the fields, it is on condition of surrendering a quarter of the produce to his master, and another quarter to the government and the middlemen. And this tax, levied upon him by the State, the capitalist, the lord of the manor, and the middleman, is always increasing; it rarely leaves him the power to improve his system of culture. If he turns to industry, he is allowed to work–though not always even that --only on condition that he yield a half or two-thirds of the product to him whom the land recognizes as the owner of the machine.
We cry shame on the feudal baron who forbade the peasant to turn a clod of earth unless he surrendered to his lord a fourth of his crop. We call those the barbarous times. But if the forms have changed, the relations have remained the same, and the worker is forced, under the name of free contract, to accept feudal obligations. For, turn where he will, he can find no better conditions. Everything has become private property, and he must accept, or die of hunger."
The Conquest of Bread
That betrays a lack of understanding about leftism. Government control over the economy is one way, yes. But your two options aren’t public dictator and private dictator.
Worker coops, syndicated unions (anarcho-syndicalism), anarcho-communism, gift economy…
Within the confines of the system you can also balance power quite a bit with UBI, mandated worker councils, worker representation on the company board of directors, etc.
As long as people are not allowed to fend for themselves because everything is privatized and commodified and you need to work for someone else to stay alive then you will not have freedom, a free market that retains that power dynamic just gives your employer even more ownership over you.
oh fuck off, every single bit of progress you enjoy from history had people willing to commit violence behind it.
let’s vote musk out!!!