What’s wrong ?
Des fois j’oublie des , d’auters fois je mélnage leurs lettres.
What’s wrong ?
Same for the french police force :
French police say ‘we are at war with vermin’ as they threaten revolt over rioting
United Nations: France must ‘seriously address’ police racism
Former US President Donald Trump said: ‘What do you have to lose? Take it.’
As a proud and patriotic French, I can’t let the murican brag about their (former) President without bragging about our former and current President whom happen to be a very good epidemiologist :
Today his profile rose even higher, as French President Emmanuel Macron traveled to Marseille to meet Raoult, a hospital director and researcher who led the two trials. Macron did not comment after the meeting, but the rendezvous, initiated by Macron, was a clear sign of Raoult’s newfound political clout. Jean-Paul Hamon, president of the Federation of Doctors of France, one of many scientists and doctors critical of the meeting, called it “showbiz politics.”
A survey released by French polling institute IFOP on 6 April revealed that 59% of the French population believes chloroquine is effective against the new coronavirus. Confidence in the drugs is higher on the far right and far left, and reached 80% among sympathizers of the “yellow vest” movement that staged massive protests against Macron’s economic policy in 2018 and 2019. Support is also very high, at 74%, in the Marseille region.
Karine Lacombe, head of infectious diseases at the Saint Antoine Hospital in Paris, has said on French TV that she and her team have received repeated “physical threats” for refusing to prescribe chloroquine; she said she has also seen many falsified prescriptions for the drug. Other doctors have reported similar experiences. The pressure comes on top of the stress caused by shortages of protective equipment, diagnostic tests, and medical staff.
Do you mean that some scientists will comply with Texas Republicans agenda and provide scientific endorsement to their climate change revisionism just to keep their funding and job ?
or focus on anything other than getting the rich what they want at everyone else’s expense.
I guess that means they are able to do a good work, it’s just that their good work is not about solving global problems.
So what does is change about the facts in this article? If know about her, I guess you known about the social cleansing that happened in Paris, so why just focus on her instead of the subject ?
Funny enough, this critic is mostly made from people outside “her community”…