I know right, I have no idea where a tram is going.

I did this, and then my then-gf desperately searched for a cable one day…

Nicotine is synergetic with amphetamines, double win.

If you have no idea who’s using your car to break laws repeatedly, shouldn’t it be impounded?

Weird how a photograph wouldn’t be able to identify a driver… sure, you can cast doubt, but unless you’re wearing a mask it still should hold up in court…?

Except if the crackhead wrote what the AI wrote, he’d be prosecuted for conspiracy, solicitation, or whatever.

But Ukraine has a navy…?

Nah, but many are too dumb to say no if the opportunity were to present itself.

There’s nothing wrong with snitching if someone is unduly threatening you.

I never get back pain, because I get it all in my shoulders and neck instead.

How does that work? Aren’t you still paying quite a bit of US taxes, and then also paying UK taxes?

Nice thought, but the law says “sex at birth”, they probably know it from social security records or whatever. And your “incorrect” license isn’t valid while waiting for appeals… and it’s not like they’d prioritize it anyways. Messed up situation.

Just get a greyhound… it’s basically the same thing, except when they then turn around, and push you out of the bed.

Is Violet8 the evolution of Mickey7 ?

I think this particular lawsuit is legitimate and should proceed.

How? I’m not a lawyer, but the law says that gambling is when you’ll get “something of value”. The law defining “something of value” includes “exchangeable for money”… But you can’t exchange loot box rewards for money.

I don’t like the lootbox scheme, but it should be coded better into the laws instead of gambling on the courts.

sends a company to check if they still work every year

Wtf, isn’t it just pressing a button…? Though I guess you avoid the risk of people forgetting.

It’s also required in Sweden, but the building owner is responsible for installation, whereas the people living there are responsible for testing that it still works.

Bundesrecht Art. 28g:

1 Any person whose personality rights are directly affected by a representation of events in periodically appearing media, especially the press, radio or television, shall have a right of reply.

2 There is no right of reply in respect of accurate reports of the public dealings of an authority in which the affected person took part.

I’m not an expert on Swiss law, but I don’t see any reason that they’d be entitled to a reply…? Let’s hope the courts see it the same way. Bullying small independent media for their factual reporting is just low.

I hope her reports continued to “take an entire day”.

I’ve just never seen one like that, it has always been on my right hand side in every car I’ve had.

Hey grandpa, what does that “push button & turn” thingy do? Handbrake?

Otherwise, etckeeper is nice.