Class: He/him/they.
Alignment: Hopeful loser.
Aesthetic: WIP, horror vacui / amor copia.

🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧
🚧 UNDER CONSTRUCTION🚧
🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧

  • 4 Posts
  • 3.49K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 18th, 2024

help-circle










  • And lemmy is thriving because individuals like you and me gave enough of a fuck to shift over to this place.

    But look if someone wants to buy a game they can just do that. I was speaking more generally, like in spots you feel principled enough hell yeah be that nuisance.

    I’m not saying like fixate on individual action or think your one part “moves the needle” but that it’s part of collective action. Like how are you going to find your collective if you aren’t out there showing what you’re about.

    It’s like voting. Yeah yeah, it makes virtually no different. 1 half-brick in a sock is worth a million votes. But you’ve still got to pitch in and be one of the little drops. There are multiple borders in the war against working class people and you just do what you can in the ones you’re able to.

    PS Just to be clear, none of this is meant in a combative tone. I’m reading this as a friendly back-and-forth.



  • I kind of don’t believe in a big “the problem” at least not in a totalizing way, especially if it’s a problem so big people can’t have any impact on it. I feel like there are a thousand of these battlefields, in our personal relationships, working life, civic life, consumer relationships.

    I’m not saying tackling your big the problem wouldn’t be a huge help across the board, but we’d still have other problems. Hell maybe some problems are just part of human nature and will be with us forever.

    In any case, even if there is one big huge ur-problem from which all problems spread like tentacles we can each only act on an I individual level, so I believe all change starts there—it can’t end there, but there it starts, and from there branches into collective action against the bigger problems in the world.

    Does that make sense? I’m not meaning it in a contradictory way. But that negating the importance of individual action can actually disempower people from taking their part in collective action. Like it never gets off the ground because every individual just goes “well I’m just one person, so…”





  • I have access to essentially unlimited local compute at my work. Some of my coworkers use it to run LLMs, some use the pre-enshittified corporate models, and I gave all that a shot—like really went for it, but ultimately would rather just work at my own pace.

    In my workplace the people who use them come off as kind of frantic to my eye. Like they’re always making these overly engineered greenfield things no one asked for, which gets them a shout out at quarterly and then no one ever thinks of it again…

    I’m not saying there’s 0 legitimate use for the technology if you could divorce it from its problematic origins, but I’m not that smart, and people are increasingly coming to me for help when previously they seemed happy to just talk to their little corporate minder.

    I feel like chatbot and text generating models generally encourage dark patterns we don’t even have names for yet and I’m just highly wary of the whole thing.