I sincerely hope this is the judge setting the stage for dismissing the case with prejudice - which is lawyer speak for “you fucked this up so much and so categorically that I’m going to prohibit you from re-filing the case, even if you fix the deficiencies I’m going to point out to you”.
Then the shareholders shouldn’t hold shares in that bank. Simple as.
In terms of cognizance, a few seconds.
More broadly, in terms of achieving activation energy for the day and so on:
W…wow. That’s uh… huh.
No, because while racial gerrymandering is illegal because race is a protected class, political gerrymandering is not because political affiliation is not a protected class.
More specifically: staunchly Republican supporting areas tends to lean heavily white, while staunchly Democratic supporting areas tend to be much more cosmopolitan and racially heterogeneous. This had pretty obvious implications on the legal viability of gerrymandering towards the right in our one-dimensional political system - assuming, of course, anyone actually gives a shit about court orders and precedent, which the current regime (and I lump the Texas state government in with them) kinda doesn’t, so who fucking knows.
A low-key hilarious artifact of the prohibition of racial gerrymandering and acceptability of political gerrymandering is that Republican-gerrymandered maps are pretty much ALWAYS gonna be more overtly racially biased than Democratic-gerrymandered maps.
By which I mean: staunchly Republican supporting areas tends to lean heavily white, while staunchly Democratic supporting areas tend to be much more cosmopolitan and racially heterogeneous.
Also, worth calling out the fact that the ACA would have been much better and more comprehensive and cheaper for EVERYONE from the get-go were it not for the GOP, as well as the insurance lobbyists
She’s about to find out:
We are all chemicals on this blessed day
As a city person:
It’s not that I care about the personal impact that it has on me. It doesn’t affect me at all, to be blunt.
It may in fact be true that there are areas where there was nothing other than a DG (the company was founded in 1939, so it’s been around for a while), but in terms of the last few decades, it’s absolutely true that they’re undercutting an absolute shitload of local mom + pop general stores and driving them out of business, then exploiting their new captive audience and charging them more per unit mass/volume on everything. It’s literally their business model. That business model is predatory.
Anyways, if that’s not something that you can understand or admit, I don’t think any explanation from a random “city person” on the internet is going to convince you.
I took that to mean singularities
Gravity too
How did they squander being the name in autonomous vacuum devices…? It’s kinda baffling tbh.
That, or TempleOS
Don’t forget: I’m nearly certain that part of the regime’s plan is to build a Trump Tower Gaza. And if Hamas or whoever decided that it needs to be… exothermically rearranged, well, I think that would be lovely.
Tbh I refuse to patronize dollar general, because they are an absolute cancer of a corporate entity (yes, I know how little that narrows it down, but their business model really is unbelievably caustic, in that it specifically preys upon socioeconomically depressed areas and actively makes them worse).
Florida:
hold my beer
I use the british-ism, because “bonnet” sounds far less stupid than “frunk”
On one hand: for me, as an aisle-seat-preferer, the draw of a window seat is simply not having a meatbag on both sides of me.
On the other hand: yeah it’s definitely false advertising.
It’s so depressing how dumb most people running the show nowadays are, even if you put aside the overt malice